|
|
|
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ |
|
|
|
$\forall i, j \in \N$ mit $i \neq j$. Damit folgt wegen |
|
|
|
$\mathcal{D}$ Dynkinsystem |
|
|
|
\[ |
|
|
|
\bigcup_{i \in \N} A_i = \mathop{\dot{\bigcup_{i \in \N}}} B_i \in \mathscr{D} |
|
|
|
\bigcup_{i \in \N} A_i = \bigcupdot_{i \in \N} B_i \in \mathscr{D} |
|
|
|
.\] |
|
|
|
\end{enumerate} |
|
|
|
\end{proof} |
|
|
|
@@ -191,16 +191,17 @@ |
|
|
|
\item Sei $A \in \mathscr{H}(D)$. Dann ist $A \cap D \in \mathscr{D}_0$. Da |
|
|
|
$\mathscr{D}_0$ Dynkinsystem folgt: |
|
|
|
\begin{align*} |
|
|
|
A^{c} \cap D = (X \setminus A) \cap D = (X \cap D) \setminus (A \cap D) |
|
|
|
= \left( (X \cap D)^{c} \mathop{\dot{\cup}} (A \cap D) \right)^{c} |
|
|
|
A^{c} \cap D |
|
|
|
= D \setminus (A \cap D) |
|
|
|
= \left( D^{c} \cupdot (A \cap D) \right)^{c} |
|
|
|
\in \mathscr{D}_0 |
|
|
|
.\end{align*} |
|
|
|
\item Sei $A_i \in \mathscr{H}(D)$ $\forall i \in \N$ mit $A_i \cap A_j = \emptyset$ |
|
|
|
$\forall i, j \in \N, i \neq j$. Dann folgt direkt, da die $A_i$ paarweise |
|
|
|
disjunkt sind und $\mathscr{D}_0$ Dynkinsystem: |
|
|
|
\[ |
|
|
|
\left( \bigcup_{i \in \N} A_i \right) \cap D |
|
|
|
= \mathop{\dot{\bigcup_{i \in \N}}} (\underbrace{A_i \cap D}_{ \in \mathscr{D}_0}) |
|
|
|
\left( \bigcupdot_{i \in \N} A_i \right) \cap D |
|
|
|
= \bigcupdot_{i \in \N} (\underbrace{A_i \cap D}_{ \in \mathscr{D}_0}) |
|
|
|
\in \mathscr{D}_0 |
|
|
|
.\] |
|
|
|
\end{enumerate} |
|
|
|
|