| @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ | |||||
| \ProvidesClass{notes} | |||||
| \LoadClass[a4paper]{amsart} | |||||
| \RequirePackage[utf8]{inputenc} | |||||
| \RequirePackage[T1]{fontenc} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{textcomp} | |||||
| \RequirePackage[german, english]{babel} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{amsmath, amssymb, amsthm} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{mdframed} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{tikz-cd} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{fancyhdr} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{geometry} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{import} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{pdfpages} | |||||
| %\RequirePackage{transparent} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{xcolor} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{array} | |||||
| \RequirePackage[shortlabels]{enumitem} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{tikz} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{pgfplots} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{listings} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{mathtools} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{forloop} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{totcount} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{calc} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{wasysym} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{environ} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{hyperref} | |||||
| \RequirePackage{graphicx} | |||||
| \usetikzlibrary{quotes, angles} | |||||
| \pgfplotsset{ | |||||
| compat=1.15, | |||||
| default 2d plot/.style={% | |||||
| grid=both, | |||||
| minor tick num=4, | |||||
| grid style={line width=.1pt, draw=gray!10}, | |||||
| major grid style={line width=.2pt,draw=gray!50}, | |||||
| axis lines=middle, | |||||
| enlargelimits={abs=0.2} | |||||
| }, | |||||
| } | |||||
| % PAGE GEOMETRY | |||||
| \geometry{ | |||||
| top=1.2in,bottom=1.4in,left=1.3in,right=1.3in, | |||||
| bottom=35mm | |||||
| } | |||||
| % PARAGRAPH no indent but skip | |||||
| %\setlength{\parskip}{3mm} | |||||
| %\setlength{\parindent}{0mm} | |||||
| \newtheorem{satz}{Proposition}[section] | |||||
| \newtheorem{theorem}[satz]{Theorem} | |||||
| \newtheorem{lemma}[satz]{Lemma} | |||||
| \newtheorem{korollar}[satz]{Corollary} | |||||
| \theoremstyle{definition} | |||||
| \newtheorem{definition}[satz]{Definition} | |||||
| \newtheorem*{definition*}{Definition} | |||||
| %\theoremstyle{definition} | |||||
| %\newmdtheoremenv{satz}{Satz}[section] | |||||
| %\newmdtheoremenv{lemma}[satz]{Lemma} | |||||
| %\newmdtheoremenv{korollar}[satz]{Korollar} | |||||
| %\newmdtheoremenv{definition}[satz]{Definition} | |||||
| \newtheorem{bsp}[satz]{Example} | |||||
| \newtheorem{bem}[satz]{Remark} | |||||
| \newtheorem{aufgabe}{Exercise} | |||||
| % enable aufgaben counting | |||||
| \regtotcounter{aufgabe} | |||||
| % temporary calculation counter | |||||
| \newcounter{var} | |||||
| \newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\Q}{\mathbb{Q}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\C}{\mathbb{C}} | |||||
| % HEADERS | |||||
| \pagestyle{headings} | |||||
| \newcommand{\incfig}[1]{% | |||||
| \def\svgwidth{\columnwidth} | |||||
| \import{./figures/}{#1.pdf_tex} | |||||
| } | |||||
| \pdfsuppresswarningpagegroup=1 | |||||
| % code listings, define style | |||||
| \lstdefinestyle{mystyle}{ | |||||
| commentstyle=\color{gray}, | |||||
| keywordstyle=\color{blue}, | |||||
| numberstyle=\tiny\color{gray}, | |||||
| stringstyle=\color{black}, | |||||
| basicstyle=\ttfamily\footnotesize, | |||||
| breakatwhitespace=false, | |||||
| breaklines=true, | |||||
| captionpos=b, | |||||
| keepspaces=true, | |||||
| numbers=left, | |||||
| numbersep=5pt, | |||||
| showspaces=false, | |||||
| showstringspaces=false, | |||||
| showtabs=false, | |||||
| tabsize=2 | |||||
| } | |||||
| % activate my colour style | |||||
| \lstset{style=mystyle} | |||||
| % better stackrel | |||||
| \let\oldstackrel\stackrel | |||||
| \renewcommand{\stackrel}[2]{% | |||||
| \oldstackrel{\mathclap{#1}}{#2} | |||||
| }% | |||||
| % integral d sign | |||||
| \makeatletter \renewcommand\d[2][]{\ensuremath{% | |||||
| \,\mathrm{d}^{#1}#2\@ifnextchar^{}{\@ifnextchar\d{}{\,}}}} | |||||
| \makeatother | |||||
| % contradiction | |||||
| \newcommand{\contr}{\text{\Large\lightning}} | |||||
| % disjoint unions: provides cupdot and bigcupdot | |||||
| \makeatletter | |||||
| \def\moverlay{\mathpalette\mov@rlay} | |||||
| \def\mov@rlay#1#2{\leavevmode\vtop{% | |||||
| \baselineskip\z@skip \lineskiplimit-\maxdimen | |||||
| \ialign{\hfil$\m@th#1##$\hfil\cr#2\crcr}}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\charfusion}[3][\mathord]{ | |||||
| #1{\ifx#1\mathop\vphantom{#2}\fi | |||||
| \mathpalette\mov@rlay{#2\cr#3} | |||||
| } | |||||
| \ifx#1\mathop\expandafter\displaylimits\fi} | |||||
| \makeatother | |||||
| \newcommand{\cupdot}{\charfusion[\mathbin]{\cup}{\cdot}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\bigcupdot}{\charfusion[\mathop]{\bigcup}{\cdot}} | |||||
| \ExplSyntaxOn | |||||
| % S-tackrelcompatible ALIGN environment | |||||
| % some might also call it the S-uper ALIGN environment | |||||
| % uses regular expressions to calculate the widest stackrel | |||||
| % to put additional padding on both sides of relation symbols | |||||
| \NewEnviron{salign} | |||||
| { | |||||
| \begin{align} | |||||
| \lec_insert_padding:V \BODY | |||||
| \end{align} | |||||
| } | |||||
| % starred version that does no equation numbering | |||||
| \NewEnviron{salign*} | |||||
| { | |||||
| \begin{align*} | |||||
| \lec_insert_padding:V \BODY | |||||
| \end{align*} | |||||
| } | |||||
| % some helper variables | |||||
| \tl_new:N \l__lec_text_tl | |||||
| \seq_new:N \l_lec_stackrels_seq | |||||
| \int_new:N \l_stackrel_count_int | |||||
| \int_new:N \l_idx_int | |||||
| \box_new:N \l_tmp_box | |||||
| \dim_new:N \l_tmp_dim_a | |||||
| \dim_new:N \l_tmp_dim_b | |||||
| \dim_new:N \l_tmp_dim_needed | |||||
| % function to insert padding according to widest stackrel | |||||
| \cs_new_protected:Nn \lec_insert_padding:n | |||||
| { | |||||
| \tl_set:Nn \l__lec_text_tl { #1 } | |||||
| % get all stackrels in this align environment | |||||
| \regex_extract_all:nnN { \c{stackrel}{(.*?)}{(.*?)} } { #1 } \l_lec_stackrels_seq | |||||
| % get number of stackrels | |||||
| \int_set:Nn \l_stackrel_count_int { \seq_count:N \l_lec_stackrels_seq } | |||||
| \int_set:Nn \l_idx_int { 1 } | |||||
| \dim_set:Nn \l_tmp_dim_needed { 0pt } | |||||
| % iterate over stackrels | |||||
| \int_while_do:nn { \l_idx_int <= \l_stackrel_count_int } | |||||
| { | |||||
| % calculate width of text | |||||
| \hbox_set:Nn \l_tmp_box {$\seq_item:Nn \l_lec_stackrels_seq { \l_idx_int + 1 }$} | |||||
| \dim_set:Nn \l_tmp_dim_a {\box_wd:N \l_tmp_box} | |||||
| % calculate width of relation symbol | |||||
| \hbox_set:Nn \l_tmp_box {$\seq_item:Nn \l_lec_stackrels_seq { \l_idx_int + 2 }$} | |||||
| \dim_set:Nn \l_tmp_dim_b {\box_wd:N \l_tmp_box} | |||||
| % check if 0.5*(a-b) > minimum padding, if yes updated minimum padding | |||||
| \dim_compare:nNnTF | |||||
| { 1pt * \dim_ratio:nn { \l_tmp_dim_a - \l_tmp_dim_b } { 2pt } } > { \l_tmp_dim_needed } | |||||
| { \dim_set:Nn \l_tmp_dim_needed { 1pt * \dim_ratio:nn { \l_tmp_dim_a - \l_tmp_dim_b } { 2pt } } } | |||||
| { } | |||||
| \quad | |||||
| % increment list index by three, as every stackrel produces three list entries | |||||
| \int_incr:N \l_idx_int | |||||
| \int_incr:N \l_idx_int | |||||
| \int_incr:N \l_idx_int | |||||
| } | |||||
| % replace all relations with align characters (&) and add the needed padding | |||||
| \regex_replace_all:nnN | |||||
| { (<&|&<|\c{iff}&|&\c{iff}|\c{impliedby}&|&\c{impliedby}|\c{implies}&|&\c{implies}|\c{approx}&|&\c{approx}|\c{equiv}&|&\c{equiv}|=&|&=|\c{le}&|&\c{le}|\c{ge}&|&\c{ge}|&\c{stackrel}{.*?}{.*?}|\c{stackrel}{.*?}{.*?}&|&\c{neq}|\c{neq}&|\c{simeq}&|&\c{simeq}) } | |||||
| { \c{kern} \u{l_tmp_dim_needed} \1 \c{kern} \u{l_tmp_dim_needed} } | |||||
| \l__lec_text_tl | |||||
| \l__lec_text_tl | |||||
| } | |||||
| \cs_generate_variant:Nn \lec_insert_padding:n { V } | |||||
| \ExplSyntaxOff | |||||
| @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ | |||||
| @book {hartshorne, | |||||
| AUTHOR = {Hartshorne, Robin}, | |||||
| TITLE = {Residues and duality}, | |||||
| SERIES = {Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 20}, | |||||
| NOTE = {Lecture notes of a seminar on the work of A. Grothendieck, | |||||
| given at Harvard 1963/64, | |||||
| With an appendix by P. Deligne}, | |||||
| PUBLISHER = {Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York}, | |||||
| YEAR = {1966}, | |||||
| PAGES = {vii+423}, | |||||
| MRCLASS = {14.55}, | |||||
| MRNUMBER = {0222093}, | |||||
| MRREVIEWER = {R. L. Knighten}, | |||||
| } | |||||
| @book {kashiwara, | |||||
| AUTHOR = {Kashiwara, Masaki and Schapira, Pierre}, | |||||
| TITLE = {Sheaves on manifolds}, | |||||
| SERIES = {Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental | |||||
| Principles of Mathematical Sciences]}, | |||||
| VOLUME = {292}, | |||||
| NOTE = {With a chapter in French by Christian Houzel, | |||||
| Corrected reprint of the 1990 original}, | |||||
| PUBLISHER = {Springer-Verlag, Berlin}, | |||||
| YEAR = {1994}, | |||||
| PAGES = {x+512}, | |||||
| ISBN = {3-540-51861-4}, | |||||
| MRCLASS = {58G07 (18F20 32C38 35A27)}, | |||||
| MRNUMBER = {1299726}, | |||||
| } | |||||
| @book {gelfand, | |||||
| AUTHOR = {Gelfand, Sergei I. and Manin, Yuri I.}, | |||||
| TITLE = {Methods of homological algebra}, | |||||
| SERIES = {Springer Monographs in Mathematics}, | |||||
| EDITION = {Second}, | |||||
| PUBLISHER = {Springer-Verlag, Berlin}, | |||||
| YEAR = {2003}, | |||||
| PAGES = {xx+372}, | |||||
| ISBN = {3-540-43583-2}, | |||||
| MRCLASS = {18-02 (18Exx 18Gxx 55U35)}, | |||||
| MRNUMBER = {1950475}, | |||||
| DOI = {10.1007/978-3-662-12492-5}, | |||||
| URL = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12492-5}, | |||||
| } | |||||
| @article {mathew, | |||||
| AUTHOR = {Akhil Mathew}, | |||||
| TITLE = {Verdier Duality}, | |||||
| NOTE = {Expository Notes (version dated July 29, 2011), available at \url{https://math.uchicago.edu/~amathew/verd.pdf}}, | |||||
| } | |||||
| @article {mustata, | |||||
| AUTHOR = {Mircea Mustaţă}, | |||||
| TITLE = {Soft sheaves on paracompact spaces and applications}, | |||||
| NOTE = {Notes, available at \url{http://websites.umich.edu/~mmustata/SoftSheaves.pdf}}, | |||||
| } | |||||
| @@ -0,0 +1,565 @@ | |||||
| \documentclass[a4paper]{../../notes} | |||||
| \newcommand{\com}[1]{#1^{\text{\scalebox{0.7}{\textbullet}}}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\K}{\mathcal{K}} | |||||
| \renewcommand{\lim}{\varprojlim} | |||||
| \newcommand{\colim}[1]{\underset{#1}{\operatorname{colim}\;}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\spec}{\operatorname{Spec }} | |||||
| \newcommand{\sh}[1]{\mathcal{A}b(#1)} | |||||
| \newcommand{\supp}[1]{\operatorname{supp}(#1)} | |||||
| \begin{document} | |||||
| \section{Overview} | |||||
| These notes mostly follow \cite{mathew}. Some ideas are taken | |||||
| from \cite{gelfand}. | |||||
| In the following, for a topological space $X$ denote by $\sh{X}$ the category | |||||
| of sheaves of abelian groups on $X$. Furthermore, denote by | |||||
| $\mathrm{D}^{+}(X)$ the bounded below derived category of $\sh{X}$. | |||||
| \begin{definition}[Lower Shriek] | |||||
| Let $f\colon X \to Y$ be a continuous map of locally compact topological spaces. | |||||
| For $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ | |||||
| and $U \subseteq Y$ open, let | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| f_{!}(\mathcal{F})(U) = \{ s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U)) \colon \supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U \text{ proper}\} | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| \end{definition} | |||||
| \begin{lemma}[Lower shriek of sheaf is a sheaf] | |||||
| Let $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be a sheaf $f\colon X \to Y$ continuous. | |||||
| Then $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf on $Y$. | |||||
| \end{lemma} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Clearly, $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ is a sub-presheaf of the sheaf $f_{*} \mathcal{F}$. To show | |||||
| it is a sheaf, we need to verify that gluing sections in $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ gives again a | |||||
| section in $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$. | |||||
| Let $(U_i)_{i \in I}$ be a family of open sets in $Y$ and $s_i \in (f_{!} \mathcal{F})(U_i)$ | |||||
| sections. Thus $s_i \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U_i))$ such that $\supp{s_i} \xrightarrow{f} U_i$ | |||||
| is proper. | |||||
| Gluing yields a unique section $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$. We need | |||||
| to check that | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \supp{s} = \bigcup_{i \in I} \supp{s_i} \xlongrightarrow{f} \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i | |||||
| \] is proper. For this note that | |||||
| $\left(f|_{\supp{s}}\right)^{-1}(U_i) = f^{-1}(U_i) \cap \supp{s} = \supp{s_i}$ and | |||||
| being proper is local on the target. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| The goal of this and the following talk is to prove the following theorem | |||||
| \begin{theorem}[Verdier duality] | |||||
| If $X, Y$ are locally compact topological spaces of finite dimension, | |||||
| then $\mathrm{R}f_{!}$ admits a right adjoint | |||||
| $f^{!}\colon \mathrm{D}^{+}(Y) \to \mathrm{D}(X)$. | |||||
| \end{theorem} | |||||
| To show the existence of the derivative of $f_{!}$, we need to introduce an adapted class of shaves. | |||||
| \begin{definition} | |||||
| Let $X$ be a locally compact space, $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ and $Z \subseteq X$ a subset. Then | |||||
| define | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathcal{F}(Z) = \Gamma(Z, \mathcal{F}) = \Gamma(Z, i^{*}\mathcal{F}) | |||||
| \] for $i\colon Z \to X$ the canonical inclusion. | |||||
| \end{definition} | |||||
| \begin{bem} | |||||
| If $Z \subseteq X$ is a subset and $i\colon Z \to X$ the canonical inclusion, then | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathcal{F}(Z) | |||||
| = | |||||
| \left\{ (s_i, U_i)_{i \in I} \colon U_i \subseteq X \text{ open with } Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i, | |||||
| s_i \in \mathcal{F}(U_i) \text{ with } (s_i)_z = (s_{j})_z \forall i, j \in I, z \in Z \cap U_i \cap U_j\right\} / \sim | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| where $(U_i, s_i)_{i \in I} \sim (V_j, t_j)_{j \in J}$ | |||||
| if and only if $(s_i)_z = (t_j)_z$ for all $i \in I$, $j \in J$ and $z \in U_i \cap V_j \cap Z$. | |||||
| For every open neighbourhood $U$ of $Z$, we have a restriction map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(Z), s \mapsto s|_Z \coloneqq [(s, U)] | |||||
| .\] This induces a map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U) | |||||
| \to \mathcal{F}(Z) | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{lemma} | |||||
| Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$. | |||||
| If $Z \subseteq X$ is compact, the natural map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U) \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}(Z) | |||||
| \] is an isomorphism. | |||||
| \end{lemma} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Injectivity: Let $s \in \mathcal{F}(U)$ such that $s|_Z = 0$. Thus for all $z \in Z$, | |||||
| $s_z = 0$ and | |||||
| there exists an open neighbourhood | |||||
| $z \in U_z \subseteq U$ such that $s|_{U_z} = 0$. Thus $s|_{\bigcup U_z } = 0$. Since | |||||
| $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{z \in Z} U_z$, $s$ is zero in the colimit. | |||||
| Surjectivity: Take $(s_i, U_i)_{i \in I} \in \mathcal{F}(Z)$. Thus | |||||
| $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i$ and by local compactness, for every $z \in Z$, there | |||||
| exists a compact neighbourhood $z \in K_z$ such that $K_z \subseteq U_{i_z}$ for | |||||
| some $i_z \in I$. Since $Z$ is compact, finitely many suffice, so we may assume | |||||
| $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} K_i$ and $K_i \subseteq U_i \subseteq X$. | |||||
| We now want to define a section on a neighbourhood of $Z$ that locally agrees with the $s_i$. | |||||
| By induction, we may assume $n = 2$. By definition, $(s_1)_z = (s_2)_z$ for all $z \in Z \cap U_1 \cap U_2$, | |||||
| in particular $s_1|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$ and $s_2|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$ have the same restriction | |||||
| to $K_1 \cap K_2$. By the injectivity of the restriction map, | |||||
| there exists an open neighbourhood $K_1 \cap K_2 \subseteq V \subseteq U_1 \cap U_2$, such that | |||||
| $s_1|_V = s_2|_V$. Since $K_j \setminus V$ is closed in the compact $K_j$, for $j=1,2$ | |||||
| the subset $K_j \setminus V$ is compact. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, there | |||||
| exist open neighbourhoods $K_j \setminus V \subseteq U_j' \subseteq U_j$ such that | |||||
| $U_1' \cap U_2' = \emptyset$. Now $s_1|_{U_1'}$, $s_2|_{U_2'}$ and | |||||
| $s_1|_V = s_2|_V$ glue to a section $w$ on $U_1' \cup U_2' \cup V \supseteq K_1 \cup K_2 \supseteq Z$ | |||||
| such that $w|_Z = [(s_i, U_i)_{i \in I}]$. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{definition} | |||||
| A sheaf $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is \emph{soft} if | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(Z)$ is surjective whenever $Z \subseteq X$ is compact. | |||||
| \end{definition} | |||||
| \begin{bem} | |||||
| In \cite{kashiwara} our notion of softness is called \emph{c-soft}. | |||||
| For $\sigma$-compact spaces the notions agree according to Exercise II.6 in \cite{kashiwara}. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Flasque sheaves are soft] | |||||
| Recall that a sheaf $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is called \emph{flasque}, if | |||||
| for every open set $U \subseteq X$, the restriction map | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(U)$ is surjective. For $Z \subseteq X$ compact, | |||||
| we have a commutative diagram: | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| \mathcal{F}(X) \arrow{rr} \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{dr} & & \mathcal{F}(Z) \\ | |||||
| & \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U) \arrow{ur}{\simeq} & | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] Thus $\mathcal{F}$ is soft. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{satz} | |||||
| Let $X$ be a locally compact topological space. | |||||
| If $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is soft, $K \subseteq X$ is compact and $K \subseteq U$ is an open neighbourhood, | |||||
| any section over $K$ can be extended to a global section with compact support contained in $U$. | |||||
| \end{satz} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $s \in \mathcal{F}(K)$. | |||||
| By local compactness, there exists a compact neighbourhood $L$ of $K$ with $L \subseteq U$. Then | |||||
| $K \cap \partial L = \emptyset$. Consider the section on $K \cup \partial L$ given by | |||||
| $s$ on $K$ and zero on $\partial L$. Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, this can be extended | |||||
| to a global section, and a fortiori to a section $t$ over $L$. Now | |||||
| the sections given by $t$ on $L$ and $0$ on $\overline{X \setminus L}$ glue to a compactly | |||||
| supported extension of $s$. Since $L \subseteq U$, its support is contained in $U$. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \subsection{Compactly supported cohomology} | |||||
| Let $X$ be a topological space. | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Support] | |||||
| For $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, $U \subseteq X$ open and a section $s \in \mathcal{F}(U)$, | |||||
| its support $\supp{s}$ is defined as | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \{ x \in U\colon s_x \neq 0\} | |||||
| .\] This set is always closed, as its complement is open. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{definition} | |||||
| Let $U \subseteq X$ be open and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$. We define | |||||
| $\Gamma_c(U, \mathcal{F})$ as the subgroup of $\Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$ consisting of | |||||
| sections with compact support. | |||||
| \end{definition} | |||||
| \begin{bem} | |||||
| If $s, t \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$ have compact support, so does $s + t$. Thus | |||||
| $\Gamma_c(U, \mathcal{F})$ is indeed a subgroup of $\Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$. | |||||
| Taking $U = X$, this defines a functor $\Gamma_c = \Gamma_c(X, \cdot)\colon \sh{X} \to \mathcal{A}b$ | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Lower shriek and compact support] | |||||
| Let $f\colon X \to \{ *\} $ be the unique continuous map from $X$ to the one point space. | |||||
| Then $f_{!} \cdot = \Gamma_c(X, \cdot)$ | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{satz} | |||||
| $\Gamma_c$ is left exact. | |||||
| \label{satz:gamma_c-left-exact} | |||||
| \end{satz} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}''$ be an exact sequence | |||||
| in $\sh{X}$. This induces a commutative diagram | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}') \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}'') \\ | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}') \arrow{r} \arrow[hookrightarrow]{u} | |||||
| & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r} \arrow[hookrightarrow]{u} | |||||
| & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') \arrow[hookrightarrow]{u} | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| ,\] where the first row is exact. Since the vertical arrows are inclusions, | |||||
| the injectivity of $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}') \to \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F})$ is immediate. Let now | |||||
| $s \in \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \subseteq \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F})$ | |||||
| such that $s$ becomes zero in $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'')$. Thus | |||||
| by exactness of the first row, $s \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}')$. Since $s \in \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F})$, | |||||
| $s$ is compactly supported, so $s \in \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}')$. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{satz} | |||||
| Let $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ be an exact sequence | |||||
| in $\sh{X}$. Suppose $\mathcal{F}'$ is soft. Then the sequence | |||||
| $0 \to \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}') \to \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \to \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') \to 0$ | |||||
| is also exact. | |||||
| \label{satz:soft-gamma_c-exact} | |||||
| \end{satz} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| By \ref{satz:gamma_c-left-exact}, we only need to show surjectivity on the right. | |||||
| Suppose first that $X$ is compact and let $s \in \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') = \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}'')$. | |||||
| Since $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is exact, there exist | |||||
| a covering $X = \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i$ and lifts $t_i \in \mathcal{F}(U_i)$ | |||||
| of $s|_{U_i}$. By local compactness of $X$, we may assume, after a possible refinement, that each | |||||
| $U_i$ contains a compact set $V_i$ whose interiors still cover $X$. Since | |||||
| $X$ is compact, we may assume $I$ is finite. To piece together the $t_i$, we may assume, by induction, | |||||
| that $\#I = 2$. | |||||
| Consider $t_1|_{U_1 \cap U_2} - t_2|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$. This is necessarily a section $e'$ of | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}'(U_1 \cap U_2)$ as it maps to zero in $\mathcal{F}''(U_1 \cap U_2)$. Restricting | |||||
| $e'$ to the compact $V_1 \cap V_2$ and extending it by softness, yields a global section $e$ of | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}'$. Now | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (t_2|_{V_2} + e|_{V_2})|_{V_1 \cap V_2} = t_2|_{V_1 \cap V_2} + e'|_{V_1 \cap V_2} = t_1|_{V_1 \cap V_2} | |||||
| .\] Thus $t_1|_{V_1}, t_2|_{V_2} + e|_{V_2}$ glue to a global section $t$ of $\mathcal{F}$ | |||||
| with image $s$. | |||||
| Now for general $X$: Let $s \in \mathcal{F}''(X)$ with compact support $Z$. By local compactness, | |||||
| there exists a compact neighbourhood $Z' \subseteq X$ of $Z$. Since | |||||
| pullback of sheaves is exact and restriction of soft sheaves to closed subsets preserves softness, | |||||
| applying the result to $Z'$, | |||||
| yields a section $t' \in \mathcal{F}(Z')$ lifting $s|_{Z'}$. The restriction | |||||
| $t'|_{\partial Z'}$ maps to $s|_{\partial Z'} = 0$, so $t'|_{\partial Z'} \in \mathcal{F}'(\partial Z')$. | |||||
| Since $\partial Z'$ is compact and $\mathcal{F}'$ is soft, $t'|_{\partial Z'}$ | |||||
| extends to a global section $b$ of $\mathcal{F}'$. Thus | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (t' - b|_{Z'})|_{\partial Z'} = t'|_{\partial Z'} - t'|_{\partial Z'} = 0 | |||||
| .\] So | |||||
| $t' - b|_{Z'}$ on $Z'$ and $0$ on $\overline{X \setminus Z'}$ glue to a global section | |||||
| $t$ of $\mathcal{F}$. Then $t|_{Z'} = t' - b|_{Z'}$ maps to $s|_{Z'}$ since | |||||
| $b \in \mathcal{F}'(X)$. Since $\supp{t}, \supp{s} \subseteq Z'$, $t$ is a compactly supported lift of $s$. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{korollar} | |||||
| If $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is an exact sequence | |||||
| in $\sh{X}$ and $\mathcal{F}', \mathcal{F}$ are soft, then | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}''$ is soft too. | |||||
| \label{kor:soft-2+3} | |||||
| \end{korollar} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $Z \subseteq X$ be compact. | |||||
| Since restricting to a closed subset is exact and preserves softness, | |||||
| by \ref{satz:soft-gamma_c-exact} $\Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}) \to \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'')$ is surjective. | |||||
| This yields a commutative | |||||
| diagram | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{d} \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') | |||||
| \arrow{d} \\ | |||||
| \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}) \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{r} & \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'') | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| ,\] where the left vertical arrow is surjective, since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft. Since | |||||
| the composition is surjective, $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') \to \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'')$ is also | |||||
| surjective. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{korollar} | |||||
| Soft sheaves are $\Gamma_c$-acyclic. | |||||
| \label{kor:soft-gamma_c-acyclic} | |||||
| \end{korollar} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be soft and | |||||
| embed $\mathcal{F}$ in an injective sheaf $\mathcal{I}$. This yields an exact sequence | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & \mathcal{F} \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \mathcal{I} \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \mathcal{G} \arrow{r} | |||||
| & 0 | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| Since $\mathcal{I}$ is injective, in particular flasque, hence soft, | |||||
| by \ref{kor:soft-2+3}, $\mathcal{G}$ is soft. | |||||
| We proceed by induction. For $i = 1$ consider the exact sequence | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{I}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{G}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \underbrace{H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0} | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{I}) \to \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{G})$ is | |||||
| surjective. By the exactness of the sequence, $H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{F})$ vanishes. | |||||
| Now assume $H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{F}) = 0$ for any soft sheaf $\mathcal{F}$. Then the exact sequence | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| \underbrace{H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0} \arrow{r} & H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{G}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \underbrace{H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0} | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| \] yields an isomorphism $H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{G}) \simeq H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{F})$ and | |||||
| since $\mathcal{G}$ is soft, the left hand side is zero by induction hypothesis. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{theorem} | |||||
| Let $f\colon X \to Y$ be a continuous map of locally compact topological spaces. If $Y$ is Hausdorff and | |||||
| $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, then there is a natural isomorphism | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (R^{i}f_{!}\mathcal{F})_y \simeq H_c^{i}(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) | |||||
| \] for each $y \in Y$. | |||||
| \label{thm:base-change} | |||||
| \end{theorem} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Denote by $X_y$ the fibre of $f$ over $y$ and by $\mathcal{F}$ the restriction to $X_y$. | |||||
| Let $y \in Y$. Since $R^{i}f_{!}$ is a derived functor, it is a universal $\delta$-functor. Since restriction | |||||
| of soft sheaves to closed subspaces preserves softness, the $\delta$-functor | |||||
| $\mathcal{F} \mapsto H_c^{i}(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y)$ vanishes for soft sheaves and $i > 0$. Thus | |||||
| it is effaceable and hence universal. Therefore it suffices to define a natural isomorphism | |||||
| in degree $0$. | |||||
| Let $y \in U \subseteq Y$ open. Then consider the natural map | |||||
| \begin{salign*} | |||||
| (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U) &\longrightarrow \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y) \\ | |||||
| s &\longmapsto s|_{X_y} | |||||
| .\end{salign*} | |||||
| This is well-defined, since for any $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ with | |||||
| $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ proper, we have | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \supp{s|_{X_y}} = \supp{s} \cap X_y = \left( f|_{\supp{s}}^{U} \right)^{-1}(y) | |||||
| \] and the right hand side is compact. This map induces | |||||
| a natural map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (f_{!}\mathcal{F})_y = \colim{y \in U \subseteq Y} (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U) | |||||
| \longrightarrow \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y) | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| Injectivity: Let $s \in (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U)$ such that $s|_{X_y} = 0$. Thus | |||||
| $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ and $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ is proper. Since | |||||
| $s|_{X_y} = 0$, $f^{-1}(y) \cap \supp{s} = X_y \cap \supp{s} = \emptyset$, in particular | |||||
| $y \not\in f(\supp{s})$. Let $y \in U'$ be the complement of $f(\supp{s})$ in $U$. | |||||
| Since $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ is proper, $f(\supp{s})$ is closed in $U$, so | |||||
| $U'$ is open in $U$ and hence in $Y$. Moreover | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| f^{-1}(U') \cap \supp{s} | |||||
| \subseteq f^{-1}(U') \cap f^{-1}(f(\supp{s})) | |||||
| = f^{-1}(U' \cap f(\supp{s})) | |||||
| = f^{-1}(\emptyset) | |||||
| = \emptyset | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| Hence $s|_{f^{-1}(U')} = 0$, so $s|_{U'} = 0$. | |||||
| Surjectivity: Suppose first $\mathcal{F}$ is soft and let | |||||
| $s \in \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y)$. Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, we may extend | |||||
| $s \in \mathcal{F}(X_y)$ to a compactly supported $s \in \mathcal{F}(X) = (f_{*}\mathcal{F})(Y)$. | |||||
| Since $Y$ is Hausdorff, every compact $K \subseteq Y$ is closed and therefore its preimage | |||||
| under $f|_{\supp{s}}$ is closed in the compact $\supp{s}$, thus itself compact. Hence | |||||
| $f|_{\supp{s}}\colon \supp{s} \to Y$ is proper and $s \in (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(Y)$. | |||||
| For arbitrary $\mathcal{F}$, there exists an exact sequence | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & \mathcal{F} \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \mathcal{I} \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \mathcal{J} | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| \] with $\mathcal{I}, \mathcal{J}$ soft (e.g. injective). The functors | |||||
| $(f_{!} \cdot )_y$ and $\Gamma_c(X_y, \cdot |_{X_y})$ are left exact, so we have a commuting diagram | |||||
| with exact rows: | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & (f_!\mathcal{F})_y \arrow{r} \arrow{d} | |||||
| & (f_!\mathcal{I})_y \arrow{r} \arrow{d}{\simeq} | |||||
| & (f_!\mathcal{J})_y \arrow{d}{\simeq} \\ | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{I}_y) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{J}_y) | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] The five-lemma yields the desired isomorphism. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{theorem} | |||||
| Consider a cartesian diagram of locally compact Hausdorff spaces: | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| X \times_Y Z \arrow{r}{f'} \arrow{d}{p'} & X \arrow{d}{p} \\ | |||||
| Z \arrow{r}{f} & Y | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] Then there is a natural isomorphism, for any | |||||
| $\com{\mathcal{F}} \in \mathcal{D}^{+}(X)$, | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| f^{*} \mathrm{R}p_{!} \com{\mathcal{F}} \simeq \mathrm{R}p_!' f'^{*} \com{\mathcal{F}} | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| \end{theorem} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| By the universal property of derived functors, it suffices to define a natural transformation | |||||
| $f^{*}p_{!} \to \mathrm{R} p_{!}'f'^{*}$. By composing with the canonical | |||||
| natural transformation $p_{!}'f'^{*} \to \mathrm{R}p_{!}'f'^{*}$, it suffices to define | |||||
| the dotted arrow in the diagram below | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| f^{*}p_{!} \arrow[dashed]{rr} \arrow[dotted]{dr} & & \mathrm{R} p_{!}'f'^{*} \\ | |||||
| & p_{!}'f'^{*} \arrow[swap]{ur}{can} & | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] By naturality, it is sufficient to define for $\mathcal{G} \in \sh{X}$ a natural map | |||||
| $f^{*}p_! \mathcal{G} \to p_!'f'^{*}\mathcal{G}$. Since | |||||
| $f^{*} \dashv f_{*}$, this is equivalent to defining a natural map | |||||
| $p_!\mathcal{G} \to f_{*} p_{!}'f'^{*} \mathcal{G}$. | |||||
| Again using $f'^{*} \dashv f'_{*}$, the map $\text{id}_{f'^{*} \mathcal{G}}$ induces a map | |||||
| $\mathcal{G} \to f'_{*} f'^{*} \mathcal{G}$. Applying | |||||
| $p_{*}$ yields $p_{*} \mathcal{G} \to p_{*}f'_{*}f'^{*} \mathcal{G}$. By the commutativity of the diagram | |||||
| we have $p_{*} f'_{*} = (pf')_{*} = (fp')_{*} = f_{*} p'_{*}$, so a map | |||||
| $\varphi\colon p_{*} \mathcal{G} \to f_{*} p'_{*} f'^{*} \mathcal{G}$. | |||||
| For $U \subseteq Y$ open, this induces a map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \varphi_U\colon \mathcal{G}(p^{-1}(U)) \longrightarrow (f'^{*} \mathcal{G})(p'^{-1}(f^{-1}(U))) | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| Let now $s \in \mathcal{G}(p^{-1}(U))$ such that | |||||
| $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{p} U$ is proper. Since $f'^{*}$ preserves stalks, for | |||||
| $(x, z) \in p^{-1}(U) \times_U f^{-1}(U)$ we have the following equivalences | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (x, z) \in \supp{\varphi_U(s)} | |||||
| \iff \varphi_U(s)_{(x, z)} \neq 0 | |||||
| \iff s_{f'(x,z)} \neq 0 | |||||
| \iff s_{x} \neq 0 | |||||
| \iff x \in \supp{s} | |||||
| .\] Thus $\supp{\varphi_U(s)} = \supp{s} \times_{U} f^{-1}(U)$. We therefore have the following | |||||
| commutative diagram: | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| \supp{s} \times_{U} f^{-1}(U) \arrow{d} \arrow{r} & \supp{s} \arrow{d} \\ | |||||
| f^{-1}(U) \arrow{r} & U | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] By assumption the right vertical arrow is proper. Since properness is stable under (topological) | |||||
| base change, the left vertical arrow is proper too. Hence | |||||
| $\supp{\varphi_U(s)} \xrightarrow{p'} f^{-1}(U)$ is proper and | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \varphi_U(s) \in (p'_{!}f'^{*} \mathcal{G})(f^{-1}(U)) = (f_{*} p'_{!}f'^{*} \mathcal{G})(U) | |||||
| .\] Thus $\varphi$ restricts to a natural map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| p_{!} \mathcal{G} \longrightarrow f_{*} p'_{!} f'^{*} \mathcal{G} | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| To check that this is an isomorphism, we can use the fact that both functors are | |||||
| way-out functors in the sense of Section 7 in \cite{hartshorne}. Thus we only need to check | |||||
| this for a single sheaf $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, i.e. we want to show | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| f^{*} R^{i} p_{!} \mathcal{F} \xlongrightarrow{\simeq} R^{i}p_{!}'f'^{*}\mathcal{F} | |||||
| \] for all $i \ge 0$. Again by universality of the $\delta$-functors involved, | |||||
| we may assume $i = 0$. Moreover, we can check this at the level of stalks. Let $z \in Z$. Then | |||||
| on the left hand side | |||||
| \begin{equation} | |||||
| (f^{*}p_{!}\mathcal{F})_z | |||||
| \simeq | |||||
| (p_{!} \mathcal{F})_{f(z)} | |||||
| \stackrel{\ref{thm:base-change}}{\simeq} | |||||
| \Gamma_c(p^{-1}(f(z)), \mathcal{F}|_{p^{-1}(f(z))}) | |||||
| = | |||||
| \Gamma_c(f'(p'^{-1}(z))), \mathcal{F}|_{f'(p'^{-1}(z))}) | |||||
| \label{eq:1} | |||||
| \end{equation} | |||||
| On the right hand side, we have | |||||
| \begin{equation} | |||||
| (p'_{!} f'^{*} \mathcal{F})_z | |||||
| \stackrel{\ref{thm:base-change}}{\simeq} | |||||
| \Gamma_c(p'^{-1}(z), (f'^{*} \mathcal{F})|_{p'^{-1}(z)}) | |||||
| \label{eq:2} | |||||
| \end{equation} | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}|_{f'(p'^{-1}(z))}$ and | |||||
| $(f'^{*} \mathcal{F})|_{p'^{-1}(z)}$ are given as the sheafification of the same presheaf, indeed: | |||||
| \begin{salign*} | |||||
| \colim{p'^{-1}(z) \subseteq U \subseteq X \times_Y Z} \; (f'^{*}\mathcal{F})(U) | |||||
| &= \colim{p'^{-1}(z) \subseteq U \subseteq X \times_Y Z} \quad | |||||
| \colim{f'(U) \subseteq V \subseteq X} \; \mathcal{F}(V) \\ | |||||
| &= \colim{f'(p'^{-1}(z)) \subseteq V \subseteq X} \; \mathcal{F}(V) | |||||
| .\end{salign*} | |||||
| This shows (\refeq{eq:1}) $\simeq$ (\refeq{eq:2}) and concludes the proof. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{satz} | |||||
| Soft sheaves are $f_!$-acyclic. In particular, if | |||||
| $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is an exact sequence in $\sh{X}$ | |||||
| and $\mathcal{F}'$ is soft, then the sequence | |||||
| $0 \to f_!\mathcal{F}' \to f_!\mathcal{F} \to f_!\mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is exact. | |||||
| \end{satz} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $i > 0$ and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be soft. Then for $y \in Y$ | |||||
| \begin{salign*} | |||||
| (R^{i}f_!\mathcal{F})_y | |||||
| \stackrel{\ref{thm:base-change}}{\simeq} H_c^{i}(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) | |||||
| \; \stackrel{\ref{kor:soft-gamma_c-acyclic}}{=} \; 0 | |||||
| ,\end{salign*} | |||||
| since the restriction of a soft sheaf to a closed subset is soft. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{bsp} | |||||
| Let $U \subseteq X$ be open and $j\colon U \to X$ the inclusion map. By looking at stalks, | |||||
| one finds that $j_!\mathcal{F}$ for $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{U}$ is just extension by zero. | |||||
| \end{bsp} | |||||
| \begin{satz}[Lower shriek preserves softness] | |||||
| If $f\colon X \to Y$ is continuous and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is soft, then | |||||
| $f_! \mathcal{F}$ is soft too. | |||||
| \end{satz} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $Z \subseteq Y$ be compact and | |||||
| $s \in (f_!\mathcal{F})(Z) \simeq \colim{Z \subseteq U \subseteq Y} (f_!\mathcal{F})(U)$. Then | |||||
| there exists an open neighbourhood $U$ of $Z$ and an extension | |||||
| $\tilde{s} \in (f_!\mathcal{F})(U) \subseteq \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ with | |||||
| $\supp{\tilde{s}} \xrightarrow{f} U$ proper. Since $Y$ is locally compact, there exists | |||||
| a compact neighbourhood $L \subseteq U$ of $Z$. Restricting $\tilde{s}$ to the compact | |||||
| $K \coloneqq \left(f|_{\supp{\tilde{s}}}\right)^{-1}(L) \subseteq \supp{\tilde{s}}$ | |||||
| and extending by softness of $\mathcal{F}$, yields a compactly supported global section | |||||
| $t \in \mathcal{F}(X) = (f_{*}\mathcal{F})(Y)$ such that $t|_Z = s$. Since | |||||
| $\supp{t}$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff, $\supp{t} \xrightarrow{f} Y$ is proper. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{korollar}[Leray spectral sequence] | |||||
| Given maps $f\colon X \to Y$, $g\colon Y \to Z$ of locally compact Hausdorff spaces, | |||||
| there is a natural isomorphism | |||||
| $\mathrm{R}(g \circ f)_{!} \simeq \mathrm{R}g_{!} \circ \mathrm{R}f_{!}$. | |||||
| \end{korollar} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Since soft sheaves are $f_{!}$ (and $g_!$) acyclic and $f_{!}$ maps | |||||
| soft sheaves to soft sheaves, the result follows from | |||||
| Proposition 5.4 in \cite{hartshorne}. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \bibliographystyle{alpha} | |||||
| \bibliography{refs} | |||||
| \end{document} | |||||
| @@ -0,0 +1,682 @@ | |||||
| \documentclass{../../notes} | |||||
| \newcommand{\com}[1]{#1^{\text{\scalebox{0.7}{\textbullet}}}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\K}{\mathcal{K}} | |||||
| \renewcommand{\lim}{\varprojlim} | |||||
| \newcommand{\colim}[1]{\underset{#1}{\operatorname{colim}\;}} | |||||
| \newcommand{\spec}{\operatorname{Spec }} | |||||
| \newcommand{\sh}[1]{\mathcal{A}b(#1)} | |||||
| \newcommand{\supp}[1]{\operatorname{supp}(#1)} | |||||
| \title{Lower shriek} | |||||
| \author{Christian Merten} | |||||
| \begin{document} | |||||
| \section{Preliminaries} | |||||
| These notes mostly follow \cite{mathew}. Some ideas are taken | |||||
| from \cite{gelfand} and \cite{kashiwara}. | |||||
| In the following, a topological space $X$ is always assumed to be locally compact and Hausdorff. | |||||
| Denote by $\sh{X}$ the category | |||||
| of sheaves of abelian groups on $X$. Furthermore, denote by | |||||
| $\mathrm{D}(X)$ (respectively $\mathrm{D}^{+}(X)$) the (bounded below) derived category of $\sh{X}$. | |||||
| \begin{definition}[Lower Shriek] | |||||
| Let $f\colon X \to Y$ be a continuous map of spaces. | |||||
| For $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ | |||||
| and $U \subseteq Y$ open, let | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| f_{!}(\mathcal{F})(U) = \{ s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U)) \colon \supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U \text{ proper}\} | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| \end{definition} | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Support] | |||||
| For $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, $U \subseteq X$ open and a section $s \in \mathcal{F}(U)$, | |||||
| its support $\supp{s}$ is defined as | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \{ x \in U\colon s_x \neq 0\} | |||||
| .\] This set is always closed, as its complement is open. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \color{gray} | |||||
| \begin{lemma}[Lower shriek of sheaf is a sheaf] | |||||
| Let $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be a sheaf $f\colon X \to Y$ continuous. | |||||
| Then $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf on $Y$. | |||||
| \end{lemma} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Clearly, $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ is a sub-presheaf of the sheaf $f_{*} \mathcal{F}$. To show | |||||
| it is a sheaf, we need to verify that gluing sections in $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ gives again a | |||||
| section in $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$. | |||||
| Let $(U_i)_{i \in I}$ be a family of open sets in $Y$ and $s_i \in (f_{!} \mathcal{F})(U_i)$ | |||||
| sections. Thus $s_i \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U_i))$ such that $\supp{s_i} \xrightarrow{f} U_i$ | |||||
| is proper. | |||||
| Gluing yields a unique section $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$. We need | |||||
| to check that | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \supp{s} = \bigcup_{i \in I} \supp{s_i} \xlongrightarrow{f} \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i | |||||
| \] is proper. For this note that | |||||
| $\left(f|_{\supp{s}}\right)^{-1}(U_i) = f^{-1}(U_i) \cap \supp{s} = \supp{s_i}$ and | |||||
| being proper is local on the target. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \color{black} | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Lower shriek is left exact] | |||||
| Let $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}''$ be an exact sequence | |||||
| in $\sh{X}$ and $f\colon X \to Y$ continuous. Then | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| 0 \to f_{!} \mathcal{F}' \to f_{!}\mathcal{F} \to f_{!}\mathcal{F}'' | |||||
| \] is exact. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \color{gray} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| We have the following commutative diagram | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & f_{!} \mathcal{F}' \arrow{r} \arrow[hookrightarrow]{d} | |||||
| & f_{!} \mathcal{F} \arrow{r} \arrow[hookrightarrow]{d} | |||||
| & f_{!} \mathcal{F}'' \arrow[hookrightarrow]{d} \\ | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & f_{*} \mathcal{F}' \arrow{r} | |||||
| & f_{*} \mathcal{F} \arrow{r} | |||||
| & f_{*} \mathcal{F}'' | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| ,\] where the second row is exact. Thus the claim follows. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \color{black} | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Lower shriek and compact support] | |||||
| Let $f\colon X \to \{ *\} $ be the unique continuous map from $X$ to the one point space | |||||
| and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$. | |||||
| Then | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(\{*\}) = | |||||
| \{ s \in \mathcal{F}(X)\colon \supp{s} \to \{ *\} \text{ proper}\} | |||||
| = \{ s \in \mathcal{F}(X)\colon \supp{s} \text{ compact}\} | |||||
| .\] Denote this by $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F})$. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \section{Derivative of lower shriek} | |||||
| The goal of this and the following talk is to prove the following theorem | |||||
| \begin{theorem}[Verdier duality] | |||||
| If $X, Y$ are locally compact topological spaces of finite dimension, | |||||
| then $\mathrm{R}f_{!}$ admits a right adjoint | |||||
| $f^{!}\colon \mathrm{D}^{+}(Y) \to \mathrm{D}(X)$. | |||||
| \end{theorem} | |||||
| To calculate the derivative of $f_{!}$, we need to introduce an adapted class of sheaves. | |||||
| \begin{definition} | |||||
| Let $X$ be space, $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ and $Z \subseteq X$ a subset. Then | |||||
| define | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathcal{F}(Z) = \Gamma(Z, \mathcal{F}) = \Gamma(Z, \mathcal{F}|_{Z}) | |||||
| \] where $\mathcal{F}|_{Z} = i^{*}\mathcal{F}$ for $i\colon Z \to X$ the canonical inclusion. | |||||
| \end{definition} | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Lemma 1.4 in \cite{mustata}] | |||||
| If $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, $Z_1, Z_2 \subseteq X$ are closed | |||||
| and $t_1 \in \mathcal{F}(Z_1)$, $t_2 \in \mathcal{F}(Z_2)$ are given such that | |||||
| $t_1|_{Z_1 \cap Z_2} = t_2|_{Z_1 \cap Z_2}$, then | |||||
| there exists a unique section $t \in \mathcal{F}(Z_1 \cup Z_2)$ such that | |||||
| $t|_{Z_1} = t_1$ and $t|_{Z_2} = t_2$. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \color{gray} | |||||
| \begin{bem} | |||||
| If $Z \subseteq X$ is a subset and $i\colon Z \to X$ the canonical inclusion, then | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathcal{F}(Z) | |||||
| = | |||||
| \left\{ (s_i, U_i)_{i \in I} \colon U_i \subseteq X \text{ open with } Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i, | |||||
| s_i \in \mathcal{F}(U_i) \text{ with } (s_i)_z = (s_{j})_z \forall i, j \in I, z \in Z \cap U_i \cap U_j\right\} / \sim | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| where $(U_i, s_i)_{i \in I} \sim (V_j, t_j)_{j \in J}$ | |||||
| if and only if $(s_i)_z = (t_j)_z$ for all $i \in I$, $j \in J$ and $z \in U_i \cap V_j \cap Z$. | |||||
| For every open neighbourhood $U$ of $Z$, we have a restriction map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(Z), s \mapsto s|_Z \coloneqq [(s, U)] | |||||
| .\] This induces a map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U) | |||||
| \to \mathcal{F}(Z) | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{lemma} | |||||
| Let $X$ be a space and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$. | |||||
| If $Z \subseteq X$ is compact, the natural map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U) \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}(Z) | |||||
| \] is an isomorphism. | |||||
| \end{lemma} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Injectivity: Let $s \in \mathcal{F}(U)$ such that $s|_Z = 0$. Thus for all $z \in Z$, | |||||
| $s_z = 0$ and | |||||
| there exists an open neighbourhood | |||||
| $z \in U_z \subseteq U$ such that $s|_{U_z} = 0$. Thus $s|_{\bigcup U_z } = 0$. Since | |||||
| $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{z \in Z} U_z$, $s$ is zero in the colimit. | |||||
| Surjectivity: Take $(s_i, U_i)_{i \in I} \in \mathcal{F}(Z)$. Thus | |||||
| $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i$ and by local compactness, for every $z \in Z$, there | |||||
| exists a compact neighbourhood $z \in K_z$ such that $K_z \subseteq U_{i_z}$ for | |||||
| some $i_z \in I$. Since $Z$ is compact, finitely many suffice, so we may assume | |||||
| $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} K_i$ and $K_i \subseteq U_i \subseteq X$. | |||||
| We now want to define a section on a neighbourhood of $Z$ that locally agrees with the $s_i$. | |||||
| By induction, we may assume $n = 2$. By definition, $(s_1)_z = (s_2)_z$ for all $z \in Z \cap U_1 \cap U_2$, | |||||
| in particular $s_1|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$ and $s_2|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$ have the same restriction | |||||
| to $K_1 \cap K_2$. By the injectivity of the restriction map, | |||||
| there exists an open neighbourhood $K_1 \cap K_2 \subseteq V \subseteq U_1 \cap U_2$, such that | |||||
| $s_1|_V = s_2|_V$. Since $K_j \setminus V$ is closed in the compact $K_j$, for $j=1,2$ | |||||
| the subset $K_j \setminus V$ is compact. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, there | |||||
| exist open neighbourhoods $K_j \setminus V \subseteq U_j' \subseteq U_j$ such that | |||||
| $U_1' \cap U_2' = \emptyset$. Now $s_1|_{U_1'}$, $s_2|_{U_2'}$ and | |||||
| $s_1|_V = s_2|_V$ glue to a section $w$ on $U_1' \cup U_2' \cup V \supseteq K_1 \cup K_2 \supseteq Z$ | |||||
| such that $w|_Z = [(s_i, U_i)_{i \in I}]$. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \color{black} | |||||
| \begin{definition} | |||||
| A sheaf $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is \emph{soft} if | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(Z)$ is surjective whenever $Z \subseteq X$ is compact. | |||||
| \end{definition} | |||||
| \begin{bem} | |||||
| In \cite{kashiwara} our notion of softness is called \emph{c-soft}. | |||||
| For $\sigma$-compact spaces the notions agree according to Exercise II.6 in \cite{kashiwara}. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Flasque sheaves are soft] | |||||
| Recall that a sheaf $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is called \emph{flasque}, if | |||||
| for every open set $U \subseteq X$, the restriction map | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(U)$ is surjective. For $Z \subseteq X$ compact, | |||||
| we have a commutative diagram: | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| \mathcal{F}(X) \arrow{rr} \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{dr} & & \mathcal{F}(Z) \\ | |||||
| & \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U) \arrow{ur}{\simeq} & | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] Thus $\mathcal{F}$ is soft. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{bem}[Prop. 2.5.6 in \cite{kashiwara}] | |||||
| Let $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$. Then $\mathcal{F}$ is soft if and only if for | |||||
| any closed subset $Z \subseteq X$, the restriction | |||||
| $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \to \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}|_{Z})$ | |||||
| is surjective. | |||||
| \end{bem} | |||||
| \color{gray} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| If $K \subseteq X$ is compact, $\Gamma(K, F) = \Gamma_c(K, F|_K)$, | |||||
| so the condition is sufficient. Conversely | |||||
| assume $\mathcal{F}$ is soft and let $s \in \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}|_Z)$ with | |||||
| compact support $K$. Let $U$ be a relatively compact open neighbourhood of $K$ in $X$. | |||||
| Define $\tilde{s} \in \Gamma(\partial U \cup (Z \cap \overline{U}), \mathcal{F})$ | |||||
| by setting $\tilde{s}_{Z \cap \overline{U}} = s$ | |||||
| and $\tilde{s}|_{\partial U} = 0$. By softness, this extends to a global section | |||||
| $t \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F})$. Since $t = 0$ on a neighbourhood of $\partial U$, | |||||
| we may assume $t$ is supported by $\overline{U}$. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \color{black} | |||||
| \begin{bsp} | |||||
| Let $M$ be a smooth manifold and let $f \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(K)$ be a | |||||
| section over a compact set $K$, i.e. a smooth function defined | |||||
| on some neighbourhood $U$ of $K$. Thus by using a partition of unity, | |||||
| we can extend $f$ to a global smooth function $\tilde{f} \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(M)$ | |||||
| such that $\tilde{f}|_{K} = f$. In other words, the | |||||
| sheaf $\mathcal{C}^{\infty}$ is soft. | |||||
| In a similar fashion we see that the sheaf of sections of a smooth vector bundle | |||||
| on $M$ is soft. | |||||
| \end{bsp} | |||||
| \color{gray} | |||||
| \begin{bsp} | |||||
| If $\mathcal{A}$ is a soft sheaf of rings and $\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf of $\mathcal{A}$-modules, | |||||
| then $\mathcal{F}$ is soft. Indeed, let $s \in \mathcal{F}(K)$ be a section | |||||
| over a compact set $K \subseteq X$, i.e. a section on some open neighbourhood of $K$. By | |||||
| softness we can extend the section $1 \in \mathcal{A}(K)$ to a compactly supported global section | |||||
| $i \in \mathcal{A}(X)$ with support in $U$. Thus | |||||
| $si$ extends to a global section of $\mathcal{F}$. | |||||
| \end{bsp} | |||||
| \begin{satz} | |||||
| Let $X$ be a space. | |||||
| If $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is soft, $K \subseteq X$ is compact and $K \subseteq U$ is an open neighbourhood, | |||||
| any section over $K$ can be extended to a global section with compact support contained in $U$. | |||||
| \end{satz} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $s \in \mathcal{F}(K)$. | |||||
| By local compactness, there exists a compact neighbourhood $L$ of $K$ with $L \subseteq U$. Then | |||||
| $K \cap \partial L = \emptyset$. Consider the section on $K \cup \partial L$ given by | |||||
| $s$ on $K$ and zero on $\partial L$. Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, this can be extended | |||||
| to a global section, and a fortiori to a section $t$ over $L$. Now | |||||
| the sections given by $t$ on $L$ and $0$ on $\overline{X \setminus L}$ glue to a compactly | |||||
| supported extension of $s$. Since $L \subseteq U$, its support is contained in $U$. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \color{black} | |||||
| \subsection{Compactly supported cohomology} | |||||
| Let $X$ be a space. | |||||
| %\begin{definition} | |||||
| % Let $U \subseteq X$ be open and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$. We define | |||||
| % $\Gamma_c(U, \mathcal{F})$ as the subgroup of $\Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$ consisting of | |||||
| % sections with compact support. | |||||
| %\end{definition} | |||||
| % | |||||
| %\begin{bem} | |||||
| % If $s, t \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$ have compact support, so does $s + t$. Thus | |||||
| % $\Gamma_c(U, \mathcal{F})$ is indeed a subgroup of $\Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$. | |||||
| % | |||||
| % Taking $U = X$, this defines a functor $\Gamma_c = \Gamma_c(X, \cdot)\colon \sh{X} \to \mathcal{A}b$ | |||||
| %\end{bem} | |||||
| \begin{theorem}[Base change] | |||||
| Let $f\colon X \to Y$ be a continuous map of spaces. For | |||||
| $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, there is a natural isomorphism | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (f_{!}\mathcal{F})_y \simeq \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) | |||||
| \] for each $y \in Y$. | |||||
| \label{thm:base-change} | |||||
| \end{theorem} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Denote by $X_y$ the fibre of $f$ over $y$ and by $\mathcal{F}$ the restriction to $X_y$. | |||||
| Let $y \in U \subseteq Y$ open. Then consider the natural map | |||||
| \begin{salign*} | |||||
| (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U) &\longrightarrow \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y) \\ | |||||
| s &\longmapsto s|_{X_y} | |||||
| .\end{salign*} | |||||
| This is well-defined, since for any $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ with | |||||
| $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ proper, we have | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \supp{s|_{X_y}} = \supp{s} \cap X_y = \left( f|_{\supp{s}}^{U} \right)^{-1}(y) | |||||
| \] and the right hand side is compact. This map induces | |||||
| a natural map | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (f_{!}\mathcal{F})_y = \colim{y \in U \subseteq Y} (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U) | |||||
| \longrightarrow \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y) | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| Injectivity: Let $s \in (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U)$ such that $s|_{X_y} = 0$. Thus | |||||
| $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ and $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ is proper. Since | |||||
| $s|_{X_y} = 0$, $f^{-1}(y) \cap \supp{s} = X_y \cap \supp{s} = \emptyset$, in particular | |||||
| $y \not\in f(\supp{s})$. Let $y \in U'$ be the complement of $f(\supp{s})$ in $U$. | |||||
| Since $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ is proper, $f(\supp{s})$ is closed in $U$, so | |||||
| $U'$ is open in $U$ and hence in $Y$. Moreover | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| f^{-1}(U') \cap \supp{s} | |||||
| \subseteq f^{-1}(U') \cap f^{-1}(f(\supp{s})) | |||||
| = f^{-1}(U' \cap f(\supp{s})) | |||||
| = f^{-1}(\emptyset) | |||||
| = \emptyset | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| Hence $s|_{f^{-1}(U')} = 0$, so $s|_{U'} = 0$. | |||||
| Surjectivity: Suppose first $\mathcal{F}$ is soft and let | |||||
| $s \in \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y)$. Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, we may extend | |||||
| $s \in \mathcal{F}(X_y)$ to a compactly supported $s \in \mathcal{F}(X) = (f_{*}\mathcal{F})(Y)$. | |||||
| Since $Y$ is Hausdorff, every compact $K \subseteq Y$ is closed and therefore its preimage | |||||
| under $f|_{\supp{s}}$ is closed in the compact $\supp{s}$, thus itself compact. Hence | |||||
| $f|_{\supp{s}}\colon \supp{s} \to Y$ is proper and $s \in (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(Y)$. | |||||
| For arbitrary $\mathcal{F}$, there exists an exact sequence | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & \mathcal{F} \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \mathcal{I} \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \mathcal{J} | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| \] with $\mathcal{I}, \mathcal{J}$ soft (e.g. injective). The functors | |||||
| $(f_{!} \cdot )_y$ and $\Gamma_c(X_y, \cdot |_{X_y})$ are left exact, so we have a commuting diagram | |||||
| with exact rows: | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & (f_!\mathcal{F})_y \arrow{r} \arrow{d} | |||||
| & (f_!\mathcal{I})_y \arrow{r} \arrow{d}{\simeq} | |||||
| & (f_!\mathcal{J})_y \arrow{d}{\simeq} \\ | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{I}_y) \arrow{r} | |||||
| & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{J}_y) | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] The five-lemma yields the desired isomorphism. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{satz}[Lower shriek is exact on soft] | |||||
| Let $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ be an exact sequence | |||||
| in $\sh{X}$ with $\mathcal{F}'$ soft. Then the sequence | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| 0 \to f_{!}\mathcal{F}' \to f_{!}\mathcal{F} \to f_{!}\mathcal{F}'' \to 0 | |||||
| \] is exact. | |||||
| \label{satz:lower-shriek-exact-on-soft} | |||||
| \end{satz} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Since $f_{!}$ is left exact, we only need to show the surjectivity on the right, i.e. | |||||
| for every $y \in Y$ the surjectivity of $(f_{!}\mathcal{F})_y \to (f_{!}\mathcal{F}'')_y$. | |||||
| We have the following commutative diagram: | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) \arrow{r} \arrow{d} & \arrow{d} | |||||
| \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}''|_{f^{-1}(y)}) \\ | |||||
| (f_!\mathcal{F})_y \arrow{r} & (f_!\mathcal{F}'')_y | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| .\] By \ref{thm:base-change}, the vertical arrows are isomorphisms. It suffices | |||||
| thus to show the surjectivity of | |||||
| $\Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}_{f^{-1}(y)}) \to \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}''|_{f^{-1}(y)})$. | |||||
| Restriction to $f^{-1}(y)$ is exact, moreover it preserves softness. We thus reduced | |||||
| to showing that $\Gamma_c(X, \cdot)$ preserves surjections. | |||||
| Suppose first that $X$ is compact and let $s \in \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') = \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}'')$. | |||||
| Since $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is exact, there exist | |||||
| a covering $X = \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i$ and lifts $t_i \in \mathcal{F}(U_i)$ | |||||
| of $s|_{U_i}$. By local compactness of $X$, we may assume, after a possible refinement, that each | |||||
| $U_i$ contains a compact set $V_i$ whose interiors still cover $X$. Since | |||||
| $X$ is compact, we may assume $I$ is finite. To piece together the $t_i$, we may assume, by induction, | |||||
| that $\#I = 2$. | |||||
| Consider $t_1|_{U_1 \cap U_2} - t_2|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$. This is necessarily a section $e'$ of | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}'(U_1 \cap U_2)$ as it maps to zero in $\mathcal{F}''(U_1 \cap U_2)$. Restricting | |||||
| $e'$ to the compact $V_1 \cap V_2$ and extending it by softness, yields a global section $e$ of | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}'$. Now | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (t_2|_{V_2} + e|_{V_2})|_{V_1 \cap V_2} = t_2|_{V_1 \cap V_2} + e'|_{V_1 \cap V_2} = t_1|_{V_1 \cap V_2} | |||||
| .\] Thus $t_1|_{V_1}, t_2|_{V_2} + e|_{V_2}$ glue to a global section $t$ of $\mathcal{F}$ | |||||
| with image $s$. | |||||
| Now for general $X$: Let $s \in \mathcal{F}''(X)$ with compact support $Z$. By local compactness, | |||||
| there exists a compact neighbourhood $Z' \subseteq X$ of $Z$. Since | |||||
| pullback of sheaves is exact and restriction of soft sheaves to closed subsets preserves softness, | |||||
| applying the result to $Z'$, | |||||
| yields a section $t' \in \mathcal{F}(Z')$ lifting $s|_{Z'}$. The restriction | |||||
| $t'|_{\partial Z'}$ maps to $s|_{\partial Z'} = 0$, so $t'|_{\partial Z'} \in \mathcal{F}'(\partial Z')$. | |||||
| Since $\partial Z'$ is compact and $\mathcal{F}'$ is soft, $t'|_{\partial Z'}$ | |||||
| extends to a global section $b$ of $\mathcal{F}'$. Thus | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (t' - b|_{Z'})|_{\partial Z'} = t'|_{\partial Z'} - t'|_{\partial Z'} = 0 | |||||
| .\] So | |||||
| $t' - b|_{Z'}$ on $Z'$ and $0$ on $\overline{X \setminus Z'}$ glue to a global section | |||||
| $t$ of $\mathcal{F}$. Then $t|_{Z'} = t' - b|_{Z'}$ maps to $s|_{Z'}$ since | |||||
| $b \in \mathcal{F}'(X)$. Since $\supp{t}, \supp{s} \subseteq Z'$, $t$ is a compactly supported lift of $s$. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{korollar} | |||||
| If $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is an exact sequence | |||||
| in $\sh{X}$ and $\mathcal{F}', \mathcal{F}$ are soft, then | |||||
| $\mathcal{F}''$ is soft too. | |||||
| \label{kor:soft-2+3} | |||||
| \end{korollar} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $Z \subseteq X$ be closed. | |||||
| Since restricting to a closed subset is exact and preserves softness, | |||||
| by \ref{satz:lower-shriek-exact-on-soft} | |||||
| $\Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}) \to \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'')$ is surjective. | |||||
| This yields a commutative | |||||
| diagram | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{d} \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') | |||||
| \arrow{d} \\ | |||||
| \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}) \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{r} & \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'') | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| ,\] where the left vertical arrow is surjective, since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft. Since | |||||
| the composition is surjective, $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') \to \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'')$ is also | |||||
| surjective. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \section{Derived categories and functors} | |||||
| We give a brief introduction to the derived category of an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$. Let | |||||
| $F\colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be a left exact functor and let $\mathcal{A}$ have enough | |||||
| injectives. Then the classical derived functors exist. To compute $\mathrm{R}^{i}F(X)$ for an | |||||
| object $X \in \mathcal{A}$, we choose an injective resolution | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & X \arrow{r} \arrow{d} & 0 \arrow{r} \arrow{d} & 0 \arrow{r} \arrow{d} & \cdots\\ | |||||
| 0 \arrow{r} & I_0 \arrow{r} & I_1 \arrow{r} & I_2 \arrow{r} & \cdots | |||||
| \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| \] i.e. a quasiisomorphism $X \to \com{I} $. Then | |||||
| $\mathrm{R}^{i}F(X) = H^{i} F(\com{I})$. | |||||
| New idea: identify $X$ with its resolution, in other words, turn quasiisomorphisms into | |||||
| isomorphisms. First step in this direction: Consider the category $\mathcal{K}(\mathcal{A})$ | |||||
| of complexes where arrows are homomorphisms of complexes up to homotopy. Still | |||||
| quasiisomorphisms are in general not isomorphisms, so need to do more: | |||||
| Localise by the class of quasiisomorphisms. This is then called the derived category | |||||
| of $\mathcal{A}$: | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathcal{D}(\mathcal{A}) = \mathcal{K}(\mathcal{A})_{\mathcal{Q}is} | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| Exactly like in the situation for rings, not every functor $\mathcal{K}(A) \to \mathcal{K}(B)$ | |||||
| descends to the derived category, since it needs to send quasiisomorphisms to quasiisomorphisms. | |||||
| If the functor is induced by an exact functor $\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$, this is the case. For | |||||
| an arbitrary $F\colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$, we can hope that a derived functor exists. This | |||||
| is defined by a universal property, that ensures that this derived functor is in a sense | |||||
| close to the original one. | |||||
| For a left exact functor $F\colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$, there is the following result: | |||||
| \begin{theorem} | |||||
| If there exists a full additive subcategory $\mathcal{L}$ in $\mathcal{A}$ that is \emph{adapted} to $F$, i.e. | |||||
| \begin{enumerate}[(i)] | |||||
| \item for any $X \in \mathcal{A}$ there exists | |||||
| $X' \in \mathcal{L}$ and an exact sequence | |||||
| $0 \to X \to X'$ | |||||
| \item if $0 \to X' \to X \to X'' \to 0$ is exact sequence in $\mathcal{A}$ and | |||||
| $X'$, $X$ are in $\mathcal{L}$, then $X''$ is in $\mathcal{L}$ | |||||
| \item if $0 \to X' \to X \to X'' \to 0$ is exact sequence in $\mathcal{A}$ and | |||||
| if $X', X, X''$ are in $\mathcal{L}$, then the sequence | |||||
| $0 \to F(X') \to F(X) \to F(X'') \to 0$ is exact. | |||||
| \end{enumerate} | |||||
| Then the derived functor | |||||
| $\mathrm{R}F\colon \mathcal{D}^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to \mathcal{D}^{+}(\mathcal{B})$ | |||||
| exists and for any $\com{I} \in \mathcal{K}^{+}(\mathcal{L})$ we have a | |||||
| natural isomorphism | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathrm{R} F (\com{I}) \simeq F(\com{I}) | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| \end{theorem} | |||||
| Since $\sh{X}$ has enough injectives and every injective sheaf is soft, by | |||||
| \ref{satz:lower-shriek-exact-on-soft} and \ref{kor:soft-2+3}, the | |||||
| class of soft sheaves is adapted to the functor $f_!$. Thus the derived functor | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \mathrm{R} f_{!} \colon \mathcal{D}^{+}(X) \longrightarrow \mathcal{D}^{+}(Y) | |||||
| \] exists. | |||||
| \begin{korollar} | |||||
| For $\com{\mathcal{F}} \in \mathcal{K}om^{+}(\sh{X})$, we have a natural isomorphism | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| (\mathrm{R}f_{!} \com{\mathcal{F}})_y | |||||
| \simeq \mathrm{R} \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \com{\mathcal{F}}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) | |||||
| \] in $\mathcal{D}(X)$. | |||||
| \end{korollar} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $\com{\mathcal{F}} \to \com{\mathcal{I}}$ be an injective resolution. Then | |||||
| \begin{salign*} | |||||
| (\mathrm{R}f_{!} \com{\mathcal{F}})_y | |||||
| &\simeq (\mathrm{R}f_{!} \com{\mathcal{I}})_y \\ | |||||
| &\simeq (f_{!} \com{\mathcal{I}})_y \\ | |||||
| &\simeq \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \com{\mathcal{I}}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) \\ | |||||
| &\simeq \mathrm{R}\Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \com{\mathcal{I}}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) \\ | |||||
| &\simeq \mathrm{R}\Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \com{\mathcal{F}}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) | |||||
| .\end{salign*} | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| %\begin{korollar} | |||||
| % Soft sheaves are $\Gamma_c$-acyclic. | |||||
| % \label{kor:soft-gamma_c-acyclic} | |||||
| %\end{korollar} | |||||
| % | |||||
| %\begin{proof} | |||||
| % Let $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be soft and | |||||
| % embed $\mathcal{F}$ in an injective sheaf $\mathcal{I}$. This yields an exact sequence | |||||
| % \[ | |||||
| % \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| % 0 \arrow{r} & \mathcal{F} \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & \mathcal{I} \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & \mathcal{G} \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & 0 | |||||
| % \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| % .\] | |||||
| % Since $\mathcal{I}$ is injective, in particular flasque, hence soft, | |||||
| % by \ref{kor:soft-2+3}, $\mathcal{G}$ is soft. | |||||
| % We proceed by induction. For $i = 1$ consider the exact sequence | |||||
| % \[ | |||||
| % \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| % 0 \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{I}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{G}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & \underbrace{H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0} | |||||
| % \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| % .\] | |||||
| % Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{I}) \to \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{G})$ is | |||||
| % surjective. By the exactness of the sequence, $H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{F})$ vanishes. | |||||
| % Now assume $H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{F}) = 0$ for any soft sheaf $\mathcal{F}$. Then the exact sequence | |||||
| % \[ | |||||
| % \begin{tikzcd} | |||||
| % \underbrace{H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0} \arrow{r} & H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{G}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r} | |||||
| % & \underbrace{H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0} | |||||
| % \end{tikzcd} | |||||
| % \] yields an isomorphism $H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{G}) \simeq H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{F})$ and | |||||
| % since $\mathcal{G}$ is soft, the left hand side is zero by induction hypothesis. | |||||
| %\end{proof} | |||||
| %\begin{satz} | |||||
| % Soft sheaves are $f_!$-acyclic. In particular, if | |||||
| % $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is an exact sequence in $\sh{X}$ | |||||
| % and $\mathcal{F}'$ is soft, then the sequence | |||||
| % $0 \to f_!\mathcal{F}' \to f_!\mathcal{F} \to f_!\mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is exact. | |||||
| %\end{satz} | |||||
| % | |||||
| %\begin{proof} | |||||
| % Let $i > 0$ and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be soft. Then for $y \in Y$ | |||||
| % \begin{salign*} | |||||
| % (R^{i}f_!\mathcal{F})_y | |||||
| % \stackrel{\ref{thm:base-change}}{\simeq} H_c^{i}(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) | |||||
| % \; \stackrel{\ref{kor:soft-gamma_c-acyclic}}{=} \; 0 | |||||
| % ,\end{salign*} | |||||
| % since the restriction of a soft sheaf to a closed subset is soft. | |||||
| %\end{proof} | |||||
| \color{gray} | |||||
| \begin{bsp} | |||||
| Let $U \subseteq X$ be open and $j\colon U \to X$ the inclusion map. By looking at stalks, | |||||
| one finds that $j_!\mathcal{F}$ for $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{U}$ is just extension by zero. | |||||
| \end{bsp} | |||||
| \begin{satz}[Lower shriek preserves softness] | |||||
| If $f\colon X \to Y$ is continuous and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is soft, then | |||||
| $f_! \mathcal{F}$ is soft too. | |||||
| \end{satz} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Let $Z \subseteq Y$ be compact and | |||||
| $s \in (f_!\mathcal{F})(Z) \simeq \colim{Z \subseteq U \subseteq Y} (f_!\mathcal{F})(U)$. Then | |||||
| there exists an open neighbourhood $U$ of $Z$ and an extension | |||||
| $\tilde{s} \in (f_!\mathcal{F})(U) \subseteq \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ with | |||||
| $\supp{\tilde{s}} \xrightarrow{f} U$ proper. Since $Y$ is locally compact, there exists | |||||
| a compact neighbourhood $L \subseteq U$ of $Z$. Restricting $\tilde{s}$ to the compact | |||||
| $K \coloneqq \left(f|_{\supp{\tilde{s}}}\right)^{-1}(L) \subseteq \supp{\tilde{s}}$ | |||||
| and extending by softness of $\mathcal{F}$, yields a compactly supported global section | |||||
| $t \in \mathcal{F}(X) = (f_{*}\mathcal{F})(Y)$ such that $t|_Z = s$. Since | |||||
| $\supp{t}$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff, $\supp{t} \xrightarrow{f} Y$ is proper. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \begin{korollar}[Leray spectral sequence] | |||||
| Given continuous maps $f\colon X \to Y$, $g\colon Y \to Z$ of spaces, | |||||
| there is a natural isomorphism | |||||
| $\mathrm{R}(g \circ f)_{!} \simeq \mathrm{R}g_{!} \circ \mathrm{R}f_{!}$. | |||||
| \end{korollar} | |||||
| \begin{proof} | |||||
| Since soft sheaves are $f_{!}$ (and $g_!$) acyclic and $f_{!}$ maps | |||||
| soft sheaves to soft sheaves, the result follows from | |||||
| Proposition 5.4 in \cite{hartshorne}. | |||||
| \end{proof} | |||||
| \color{black} | |||||
| \section{Other functors on abelian sheaves} | |||||
| \begin{tabular}{l|l|l|l} | |||||
| Functor & Exactness & Derivative & Adapted class \\ \hline | |||||
| $f^* \colon \sh{Y} \to \sh{X}$ | |||||
| & exact | |||||
| & $f^{*}\colon \mathcal{D}(Y) \to \mathcal{D}(X)$ \\ | |||||
| $f_* \colon \sh{X} \to \sh{Y}$ | |||||
| & left exact | |||||
| & $\mathrm{R} f_{*}\colon \mathcal{D}(X) \to \mathcal{D}(Y)$ | |||||
| & K-limp complexes \\ | |||||
| $\cdot \otimes \mathcal{F} \colon \sh{X} \to \sh{X}$ | |||||
| & right exact | |||||
| & $\cdot \otimes^{L} \com{\mathcal{F}} \colon \mathcal{D}(X) \to \mathcal{D}(X)$ | |||||
| & K-flat complexes \\ | |||||
| $\underline{\operatorname{Hom}}(\mathcal{F}, \cdot)\colon \sh{X} \to \sh{X}$ | |||||
| & left exact | |||||
| & $\mathrm{R}\com{\underline{\operatorname{Hom}}}(\com{\mathcal{F}}, \cdot)\colon \mathcal{D}(X) \to \mathcal{D}(X)$ | |||||
| & K-injective complexes \\ | |||||
| $f_!\colon \sh{X} \to \sh{Y}$ | |||||
| & left exact | |||||
| & $\mathrm{R}f_{!}\colon \mathcal{D}^{+}(X) \to \mathcal{D}^{+}(Y)$ | |||||
| & soft sheaves \\ | |||||
| & | |||||
| & $f^{!}\colon \mathcal{D}^{+}(Y) \to \mathcal{D}(X)$ | |||||
| \end{tabular} | |||||
| \noindent The internal $\mathrm{Hom}$ functor is for $\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G} \in \sh{X}$ | |||||
| given by the formula | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \underline{\operatorname{Hom}}(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G})(U) | |||||
| = \operatorname{Hom}_{\sh{U}}(\mathcal{F}|_U, \mathcal{G}|_U) | |||||
| \] for every $U \subseteq X$ open and the (internal) tensor product by the sheafification | |||||
| of the presheaf | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| U \mapsto \mathcal{F}(U) \otimes \mathcal{G}(U) | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| These functors satisfy the following adjunction results | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| f^{*} \dashv \mathrm{R}f_{*} | |||||
| \] and | |||||
| \[ | |||||
| \cdot \otimes^{L} \com{\mathcal{F}} \dashv | |||||
| \mathrm{R}\underline{\operatorname{Hom}}(\com{\mathcal{F}}, \cdot ) | |||||
| .\] | |||||
| \bibliographystyle{alpha} | |||||
| \bibliography{refs} | |||||
| \end{document} | |||||