rav: fix errors
This commit is contained in:
Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
@@ -40,23 +40,21 @@ at $x$: For all $h \in k^{n}$:
|
|||||||
\end{bem}
|
\end{bem}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{definition}
|
\begin{definition}
|
||||||
We set
|
We set $\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$ to be the ideal generated
|
||||||
\[
|
by $P_x^{*}$ for all $P \in \mathcal{I}(X)$.
|
||||||
\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*} \coloneqq \{ P_x^{*} \colon P \in \mathcal{I}(X) \}
|
|
||||||
.\]
|
|
||||||
\end{definition}
|
\end{definition}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{satz}
|
%\begin{satz}
|
||||||
The set $\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$ is an ideal of $k[T_1, \ldots, T_n]$.
|
% The set $\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$ is an ideal of $k[T_1, \ldots, T_n]$.
|
||||||
\end{satz}
|
%\end{satz}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
\begin{proof}
|
%\begin{proof}
|
||||||
By definition, $0 \in \mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$. Let $P_x^{*}, Q_x^{*}$ be elements
|
% By definition, $0 \in \mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$. Let $P_x^{*}, Q_x^{*}$ be elements
|
||||||
of $\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$ coming from $P, Q \in \mathcal{I}(X)$. Then
|
% of $\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$ coming from $P, Q \in \mathcal{I}(X)$. Then
|
||||||
$P_x^{*} - Q_x^{*}$ is of the form $R_x^{*}$ for some $R \in \mathcal{I}(X)$, where
|
% $P_x^{*} - Q_x^{*}$ is of the form $R_x^{*}$ for some $R \in \mathcal{I}(X)$, where
|
||||||
$R = 0$, $R = P$, $R = Q$ or $R = P-Q$. Moreover, for $Q \in k[T_1, \ldots, T_n]$,
|
% $R = 0$, $R = P$, $R = Q$ or $R = P-Q$. Moreover, for $Q \in k[T_1, \ldots, T_n]$,
|
||||||
we have $P_x^{*} Q = (PQ)_x^{*} \in \mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$.
|
% we have $P_x^{*} Q = (PQ)_x^{*} \in \mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*}$.
|
||||||
\end{proof}
|
%\end{proof}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{bem}[]
|
\begin{bem}[]
|
||||||
The ideal $\mathcal{I}(X)^{*}$ is finitely generated. However,
|
The ideal $\mathcal{I}(X)^{*}$ is finitely generated. However,
|
||||||
@@ -324,29 +322,29 @@ consider the Zariski tangent space to $X$ at a point $x \in X$.
|
|||||||
may vary with $x$.
|
may vary with $x$.
|
||||||
\end{bem}
|
\end{bem}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{satz}[a Jacobian criterion]
|
%\begin{satz}[a Jacobian criterion]
|
||||||
If $(P_1, \ldots, P_m)$ are polynomials such that
|
% If $(P_1, \ldots, P_m)$ are polynomials such that
|
||||||
$\mathcal{I}(X) = (P_1, \ldots, P_m)$ and $\operatorname{rk } P'(x) = m$, where
|
% $\mathcal{I}(X) = (P_1, \ldots, P_m)$ and $\operatorname{rk } P'(x) = m$, where
|
||||||
$P = (P_1, \ldots, P_m)$, then $x$ is a non-singular point of $X$.
|
% $P = (P_1, \ldots, P_m)$, then $x$ is a non-singular point of $X$.
|
||||||
\end{satz}
|
%\end{satz}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
\begin{proof}
|
%\begin{proof}
|
||||||
By \ref{kor:cone-in-tangent-space} and \ref{kor:tangent-kernel-jacobian} it suffices to show that
|
% By \ref{kor:cone-in-tangent-space} and \ref{kor:tangent-kernel-jacobian} it suffices to show that
|
||||||
\[
|
% \[
|
||||||
\mathcal{C}_x(X) \supseteq x + \bigcap_{i=1} ^{m} \text{ker } P_i'(x)
|
% \mathcal{C}_x(X) \supseteq x + \bigcap_{i=1} ^{m} \text{ker } P_i'(x)
|
||||||
.\] By definition
|
% .\] By definition
|
||||||
\[
|
% \[
|
||||||
\mathcal{C}_x(X) = x + \mathcal{V}_{k^{n}}(\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*})
|
% \mathcal{C}_x(X) = x + \mathcal{V}_{k^{n}}(\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*})
|
||||||
\] and $\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*} = \{ Q_x^{*} : Q \in \mathcal{I}(X)\} $. If $Q \in \mathcal{I}(X)$,
|
% \] and $\mathcal{I}(X)_x^{*} = \{ Q_x^{*} : Q \in \mathcal{I}(X)\} $. If $Q \in \mathcal{I}(X)$,
|
||||||
there exist polynomials $Q_1, \ldots, Q_m$ such that
|
% there exist polynomials $Q_1, \ldots, Q_m$ such that
|
||||||
$Q = \sum_{i=1}^{m} Q_i P_i$, so $Q_x^{*}$ is a linear combination of the $(P_i)_x^{*}$.
|
% $Q = \sum_{i=1}^{m} Q_i P_i$, so $Q_x^{*}$ is a linear combination of the $(P_i)_x^{*}$.
|
||||||
Since $\text{rk }(P_1'(x), \ldots, P_m'(x)) = m$, we have
|
% Since $\text{rk }(P_1'(x), \ldots, P_m'(x)) = m$, we have
|
||||||
$P_i'(x) \neq 0$ for all $i$. So $(P_i)_x^{*} = P_i'(x)$ in the Taylor expansion
|
% $P_i'(x) \neq 0$ for all $i$. So $(P_i)_x^{*} = P_i'(x)$ in the Taylor expansion
|
||||||
of $P_i$ at $x$. So $Q_x^{*}$ is a linear combination
|
% of $P_i$ at $x$. So $Q_x^{*}$ is a linear combination
|
||||||
of $(P_1'(x), \ldots, P_m'(x))$,
|
% of $(P_1'(x), \ldots, P_m'(x))$,
|
||||||
which proves that if $h \in \bigcap_{i=1}^{m} \text{ker } P_i'(x)$, then
|
% which proves that if $h \in \bigcap_{i=1}^{m} \text{ker } P_i'(x)$, then
|
||||||
$Q_x^{*}(h) = 0$ for all $Q \in \mathcal{I}(X)$, hence
|
% $Q_x^{*}(h) = 0$ for all $Q \in \mathcal{I}(X)$, hence
|
||||||
$x + h \in \mathcal{C}_x(X)$.
|
% $x + h \in \mathcal{C}_x(X)$.
|
||||||
\end{proof}
|
%\end{proof}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{document}
|
\end{document}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user