Für Vorlesungen, bitte die Webseite verwenden. https://flavigny.de/lecture
Vous ne pouvez pas sélectionner plus de 25 sujets Les noms de sujets doivent commencer par une lettre ou un nombre, peuvent contenir des tirets ('-') et peuvent comporter jusqu'à 35 caractères.

683 lignes
29KB

  1. \documentclass{../../notes}
  2. \newcommand{\com}[1]{#1^{\text{\scalebox{0.7}{\textbullet}}}}
  3. \newcommand{\K}{\mathcal{K}}
  4. \renewcommand{\lim}{\varprojlim}
  5. \newcommand{\colim}[1]{\underset{#1}{\operatorname{colim}\;}}
  6. \newcommand{\spec}{\operatorname{Spec }}
  7. \newcommand{\sh}[1]{\mathcal{A}b(#1)}
  8. \newcommand{\supp}[1]{\operatorname{supp}(#1)}
  9. \title{Lower shriek}
  10. \author{Christian Merten}
  11. \begin{document}
  12. \section{Preliminaries}
  13. These notes mostly follow \cite{mathew}. Some ideas are taken
  14. from \cite{gelfand} and \cite{kashiwara}.
  15. In the following, a topological space $X$ is always assumed to be locally compact and Hausdorff.
  16. Denote by $\sh{X}$ the category
  17. of sheaves of abelian groups on $X$. Furthermore, denote by
  18. $\mathrm{D}(X)$ (respectively $\mathrm{D}^{+}(X)$) the (bounded below) derived category of $\sh{X}$.
  19. \begin{definition}[Lower Shriek]
  20. Let $f\colon X \to Y$ be a continuous map of spaces.
  21. For $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$
  22. and $U \subseteq Y$ open, let
  23. \[
  24. f_{!}(\mathcal{F})(U) = \{ s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U)) \colon \supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U \text{ proper}\}
  25. .\]
  26. \end{definition}
  27. \begin{bem}[Support]
  28. For $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, $U \subseteq X$ open and a section $s \in \mathcal{F}(U)$,
  29. its support $\supp{s}$ is defined as
  30. \[
  31. \{ x \in U\colon s_x \neq 0\}
  32. .\] This set is always closed, as its complement is open.
  33. \end{bem}
  34. \color{gray}
  35. \begin{lemma}[Lower shriek of sheaf is a sheaf]
  36. Let $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be a sheaf $f\colon X \to Y$ continuous.
  37. Then $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf on $Y$.
  38. \end{lemma}
  39. \begin{proof}
  40. Clearly, $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ is a sub-presheaf of the sheaf $f_{*} \mathcal{F}$. To show
  41. it is a sheaf, we need to verify that gluing sections in $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$ gives again a
  42. section in $f_{!}\mathcal{F}$.
  43. Let $(U_i)_{i \in I}$ be a family of open sets in $Y$ and $s_i \in (f_{!} \mathcal{F})(U_i)$
  44. sections. Thus $s_i \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U_i))$ such that $\supp{s_i} \xrightarrow{f} U_i$
  45. is proper.
  46. Gluing yields a unique section $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$. We need
  47. to check that
  48. \[
  49. \supp{s} = \bigcup_{i \in I} \supp{s_i} \xlongrightarrow{f} \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i
  50. \] is proper. For this note that
  51. $\left(f|_{\supp{s}}\right)^{-1}(U_i) = f^{-1}(U_i) \cap \supp{s} = \supp{s_i}$ and
  52. being proper is local on the target.
  53. \end{proof}
  54. \color{black}
  55. \begin{bem}[Lower shriek is left exact]
  56. Let $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}''$ be an exact sequence
  57. in $\sh{X}$ and $f\colon X \to Y$ continuous. Then
  58. \[
  59. 0 \to f_{!} \mathcal{F}' \to f_{!}\mathcal{F} \to f_{!}\mathcal{F}''
  60. \] is exact.
  61. \end{bem}
  62. \color{gray}
  63. \begin{proof}
  64. We have the following commutative diagram
  65. \[
  66. \begin{tikzcd}
  67. 0 \arrow{r} & f_{!} \mathcal{F}' \arrow{r} \arrow[hookrightarrow]{d}
  68. & f_{!} \mathcal{F} \arrow{r} \arrow[hookrightarrow]{d}
  69. & f_{!} \mathcal{F}'' \arrow[hookrightarrow]{d} \\
  70. 0 \arrow{r} & f_{*} \mathcal{F}' \arrow{r}
  71. & f_{*} \mathcal{F} \arrow{r}
  72. & f_{*} \mathcal{F}''
  73. \end{tikzcd}
  74. ,\] where the second row is exact. Thus the claim follows.
  75. \end{proof}
  76. \color{black}
  77. \begin{bem}[Lower shriek and compact support]
  78. Let $f\colon X \to \{ *\} $ be the unique continuous map from $X$ to the one point space
  79. and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$.
  80. Then
  81. \[
  82. (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(\{*\}) =
  83. \{ s \in \mathcal{F}(X)\colon \supp{s} \to \{ *\} \text{ proper}\}
  84. = \{ s \in \mathcal{F}(X)\colon \supp{s} \text{ compact}\}
  85. .\] Denote this by $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F})$.
  86. \end{bem}
  87. \section{Derivative of lower shriek}
  88. The goal of this and the following talk is to prove the following theorem
  89. \begin{theorem}[Verdier duality]
  90. If $X, Y$ are locally compact topological spaces of finite dimension,
  91. then $\mathrm{R}f_{!}$ admits a right adjoint
  92. $f^{!}\colon \mathrm{D}^{+}(Y) \to \mathrm{D}(X)$.
  93. \end{theorem}
  94. To calculate the derivative of $f_{!}$, we need to introduce an adapted class of sheaves.
  95. \begin{definition}
  96. Let $X$ be space, $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ and $Z \subseteq X$ a subset. Then
  97. define
  98. \[
  99. \mathcal{F}(Z) = \Gamma(Z, \mathcal{F}) = \Gamma(Z, \mathcal{F}|_{Z})
  100. \] where $\mathcal{F}|_{Z} = i^{*}\mathcal{F}$ for $i\colon Z \to X$ the canonical inclusion.
  101. \end{definition}
  102. \begin{bem}[Lemma 1.4 in \cite{mustata}]
  103. If $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, $Z_1, Z_2 \subseteq X$ are closed
  104. and $t_1 \in \mathcal{F}(Z_1)$, $t_2 \in \mathcal{F}(Z_2)$ are given such that
  105. $t_1|_{Z_1 \cap Z_2} = t_2|_{Z_1 \cap Z_2}$, then
  106. there exists a unique section $t \in \mathcal{F}(Z_1 \cup Z_2)$ such that
  107. $t|_{Z_1} = t_1$ and $t|_{Z_2} = t_2$.
  108. \end{bem}
  109. \color{gray}
  110. \begin{bem}
  111. If $Z \subseteq X$ is a subset and $i\colon Z \to X$ the canonical inclusion, then
  112. \[
  113. \mathcal{F}(Z)
  114. =
  115. \left\{ (s_i, U_i)_{i \in I} \colon U_i \subseteq X \text{ open with } Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i,
  116. s_i \in \mathcal{F}(U_i) \text{ with } (s_i)_z = (s_{j})_z \forall i, j \in I, z \in Z \cap U_i \cap U_j\right\} / \sim
  117. .\]
  118. where $(U_i, s_i)_{i \in I} \sim (V_j, t_j)_{j \in J}$
  119. if and only if $(s_i)_z = (t_j)_z$ for all $i \in I$, $j \in J$ and $z \in U_i \cap V_j \cap Z$.
  120. For every open neighbourhood $U$ of $Z$, we have a restriction map
  121. \[
  122. \mathcal{F}(U) \to \mathcal{F}(Z), s \mapsto s|_Z \coloneqq [(s, U)]
  123. .\] This induces a map
  124. \[
  125. \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U)
  126. \to \mathcal{F}(Z)
  127. .\]
  128. \end{bem}
  129. \begin{lemma}
  130. Let $X$ be a space and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$.
  131. If $Z \subseteq X$ is compact, the natural map
  132. \[
  133. \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U) \longrightarrow \mathcal{F}(Z)
  134. \] is an isomorphism.
  135. \end{lemma}
  136. \begin{proof}
  137. Injectivity: Let $s \in \mathcal{F}(U)$ such that $s|_Z = 0$. Thus for all $z \in Z$,
  138. $s_z = 0$ and
  139. there exists an open neighbourhood
  140. $z \in U_z \subseteq U$ such that $s|_{U_z} = 0$. Thus $s|_{\bigcup U_z } = 0$. Since
  141. $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{z \in Z} U_z$, $s$ is zero in the colimit.
  142. Surjectivity: Take $(s_i, U_i)_{i \in I} \in \mathcal{F}(Z)$. Thus
  143. $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i$ and by local compactness, for every $z \in Z$, there
  144. exists a compact neighbourhood $z \in K_z$ such that $K_z \subseteq U_{i_z}$ for
  145. some $i_z \in I$. Since $Z$ is compact, finitely many suffice, so we may assume
  146. $Z \subseteq \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} K_i$ and $K_i \subseteq U_i \subseteq X$.
  147. We now want to define a section on a neighbourhood of $Z$ that locally agrees with the $s_i$.
  148. By induction, we may assume $n = 2$. By definition, $(s_1)_z = (s_2)_z$ for all $z \in Z \cap U_1 \cap U_2$,
  149. in particular $s_1|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$ and $s_2|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$ have the same restriction
  150. to $K_1 \cap K_2$. By the injectivity of the restriction map,
  151. there exists an open neighbourhood $K_1 \cap K_2 \subseteq V \subseteq U_1 \cap U_2$, such that
  152. $s_1|_V = s_2|_V$. Since $K_j \setminus V$ is closed in the compact $K_j$, for $j=1,2$
  153. the subset $K_j \setminus V$ is compact. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, there
  154. exist open neighbourhoods $K_j \setminus V \subseteq U_j' \subseteq U_j$ such that
  155. $U_1' \cap U_2' = \emptyset$. Now $s_1|_{U_1'}$, $s_2|_{U_2'}$ and
  156. $s_1|_V = s_2|_V$ glue to a section $w$ on $U_1' \cup U_2' \cup V \supseteq K_1 \cup K_2 \supseteq Z$
  157. such that $w|_Z = [(s_i, U_i)_{i \in I}]$.
  158. \end{proof}
  159. \color{black}
  160. \begin{definition}
  161. A sheaf $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is \emph{soft} if
  162. $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(Z)$ is surjective whenever $Z \subseteq X$ is compact.
  163. \end{definition}
  164. \begin{bem}
  165. In \cite{kashiwara} our notion of softness is called \emph{c-soft}.
  166. For $\sigma$-compact spaces the notions agree according to Exercise II.6 in \cite{kashiwara}.
  167. \end{bem}
  168. \begin{bem}[Flasque sheaves are soft]
  169. Recall that a sheaf $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is called \emph{flasque}, if
  170. for every open set $U \subseteq X$, the restriction map
  171. $\mathcal{F}(X) \to \mathcal{F}(U)$ is surjective. For $Z \subseteq X$ compact,
  172. we have a commutative diagram:
  173. \[
  174. \begin{tikzcd}
  175. \mathcal{F}(X) \arrow{rr} \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{dr} & & \mathcal{F}(Z) \\
  176. & \colim{Z \subseteq U} \mathcal{F}(U) \arrow{ur}{\simeq} &
  177. \end{tikzcd}
  178. .\] Thus $\mathcal{F}$ is soft.
  179. \end{bem}
  180. \begin{bem}[Prop. 2.5.6 in \cite{kashiwara}]
  181. Let $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$. Then $\mathcal{F}$ is soft if and only if for
  182. any closed subset $Z \subseteq X$, the restriction
  183. $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \to \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}|_{Z})$
  184. is surjective.
  185. \end{bem}
  186. \color{gray}
  187. \begin{proof}
  188. If $K \subseteq X$ is compact, $\Gamma(K, F) = \Gamma_c(K, F|_K)$,
  189. so the condition is sufficient. Conversely
  190. assume $\mathcal{F}$ is soft and let $s \in \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}|_Z)$ with
  191. compact support $K$. Let $U$ be a relatively compact open neighbourhood of $K$ in $X$.
  192. Define $\tilde{s} \in \Gamma(\partial U \cup (Z \cap \overline{U}), \mathcal{F})$
  193. by setting $\tilde{s}_{Z \cap \overline{U}} = s$
  194. and $\tilde{s}|_{\partial U} = 0$. By softness, this extends to a global section
  195. $t \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F})$. Since $t = 0$ on a neighbourhood of $\partial U$,
  196. we may assume $t$ is supported by $\overline{U}$.
  197. \end{proof}
  198. \color{black}
  199. \begin{bsp}
  200. Let $M$ be a smooth manifold and let $f \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(K)$ be a
  201. section over a compact set $K$, i.e. a smooth function defined
  202. on some neighbourhood $U$ of $K$. Thus by using a partition of unity,
  203. we can extend $f$ to a global smooth function $\tilde{f} \in \mathcal{C}^{\infty}(M)$
  204. such that $\tilde{f}|_{K} = f$. In other words, the
  205. sheaf $\mathcal{C}^{\infty}$ is soft.
  206. In a similar fashion we see that the sheaf of sections of a smooth vector bundle
  207. on $M$ is soft.
  208. \end{bsp}
  209. \color{gray}
  210. \begin{bsp}
  211. If $\mathcal{A}$ is a soft sheaf of rings and $\mathcal{F}$ is a sheaf of $\mathcal{A}$-modules,
  212. then $\mathcal{F}$ is soft. Indeed, let $s \in \mathcal{F}(K)$ be a section
  213. over a compact set $K \subseteq X$, i.e. a section on some open neighbourhood of $K$. By
  214. softness we can extend the section $1 \in \mathcal{A}(K)$ to a compactly supported global section
  215. $i \in \mathcal{A}(X)$ with support in $U$. Thus
  216. $si$ extends to a global section of $\mathcal{F}$.
  217. \end{bsp}
  218. \begin{satz}
  219. Let $X$ be a space.
  220. If $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is soft, $K \subseteq X$ is compact and $K \subseteq U$ is an open neighbourhood,
  221. any section over $K$ can be extended to a global section with compact support contained in $U$.
  222. \end{satz}
  223. \begin{proof}
  224. Let $s \in \mathcal{F}(K)$.
  225. By local compactness, there exists a compact neighbourhood $L$ of $K$ with $L \subseteq U$. Then
  226. $K \cap \partial L = \emptyset$. Consider the section on $K \cup \partial L$ given by
  227. $s$ on $K$ and zero on $\partial L$. Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, this can be extended
  228. to a global section, and a fortiori to a section $t$ over $L$. Now
  229. the sections given by $t$ on $L$ and $0$ on $\overline{X \setminus L}$ glue to a compactly
  230. supported extension of $s$. Since $L \subseteq U$, its support is contained in $U$.
  231. \end{proof}
  232. \color{black}
  233. \subsection{Compactly supported cohomology}
  234. Let $X$ be a space.
  235. %\begin{definition}
  236. % Let $U \subseteq X$ be open and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$. We define
  237. % $\Gamma_c(U, \mathcal{F})$ as the subgroup of $\Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$ consisting of
  238. % sections with compact support.
  239. %\end{definition}
  240. %
  241. %\begin{bem}
  242. % If $s, t \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$ have compact support, so does $s + t$. Thus
  243. % $\Gamma_c(U, \mathcal{F})$ is indeed a subgroup of $\Gamma(U, \mathcal{F})$.
  244. %
  245. % Taking $U = X$, this defines a functor $\Gamma_c = \Gamma_c(X, \cdot)\colon \sh{X} \to \mathcal{A}b$
  246. %\end{bem}
  247. \begin{theorem}[Base change]
  248. Let $f\colon X \to Y$ be a continuous map of spaces. For
  249. $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$, there is a natural isomorphism
  250. \[
  251. (f_{!}\mathcal{F})_y \simeq \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}|_{f^{-1}(y)})
  252. \] for each $y \in Y$.
  253. \label{thm:base-change}
  254. \end{theorem}
  255. \begin{proof}
  256. Denote by $X_y$ the fibre of $f$ over $y$ and by $\mathcal{F}$ the restriction to $X_y$.
  257. Let $y \in U \subseteq Y$ open. Then consider the natural map
  258. \begin{salign*}
  259. (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U) &\longrightarrow \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y) \\
  260. s &\longmapsto s|_{X_y}
  261. .\end{salign*}
  262. This is well-defined, since for any $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ with
  263. $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ proper, we have
  264. \[
  265. \supp{s|_{X_y}} = \supp{s} \cap X_y = \left( f|_{\supp{s}}^{U} \right)^{-1}(y)
  266. \] and the right hand side is compact. This map induces
  267. a natural map
  268. \[
  269. (f_{!}\mathcal{F})_y = \colim{y \in U \subseteq Y} (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U)
  270. \longrightarrow \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y)
  271. .\]
  272. Injectivity: Let $s \in (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(U)$ such that $s|_{X_y} = 0$. Thus
  273. $s \in \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ and $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ is proper. Since
  274. $s|_{X_y} = 0$, $f^{-1}(y) \cap \supp{s} = X_y \cap \supp{s} = \emptyset$, in particular
  275. $y \not\in f(\supp{s})$. Let $y \in U'$ be the complement of $f(\supp{s})$ in $U$.
  276. Since $\supp{s} \xrightarrow{f} U$ is proper, $f(\supp{s})$ is closed in $U$, so
  277. $U'$ is open in $U$ and hence in $Y$. Moreover
  278. \[
  279. f^{-1}(U') \cap \supp{s}
  280. \subseteq f^{-1}(U') \cap f^{-1}(f(\supp{s}))
  281. = f^{-1}(U' \cap f(\supp{s}))
  282. = f^{-1}(\emptyset)
  283. = \emptyset
  284. .\]
  285. Hence $s|_{f^{-1}(U')} = 0$, so $s|_{U'} = 0$.
  286. Surjectivity: Suppose first $\mathcal{F}$ is soft and let
  287. $s \in \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y)$. Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, we may extend
  288. $s \in \mathcal{F}(X_y)$ to a compactly supported $s \in \mathcal{F}(X) = (f_{*}\mathcal{F})(Y)$.
  289. Since $Y$ is Hausdorff, every compact $K \subseteq Y$ is closed and therefore its preimage
  290. under $f|_{\supp{s}}$ is closed in the compact $\supp{s}$, thus itself compact. Hence
  291. $f|_{\supp{s}}\colon \supp{s} \to Y$ is proper and $s \in (f_{!}\mathcal{F})(Y)$.
  292. For arbitrary $\mathcal{F}$, there exists an exact sequence
  293. \[
  294. \begin{tikzcd}
  295. 0 \arrow{r} & \mathcal{F} \arrow{r}
  296. & \mathcal{I} \arrow{r}
  297. & \mathcal{J}
  298. \end{tikzcd}
  299. \] with $\mathcal{I}, \mathcal{J}$ soft (e.g. injective). The functors
  300. $(f_{!} \cdot )_y$ and $\Gamma_c(X_y, \cdot |_{X_y})$ are left exact, so we have a commuting diagram
  301. with exact rows:
  302. \[
  303. \begin{tikzcd}
  304. 0 \arrow{r} & (f_!\mathcal{F})_y \arrow{r} \arrow{d}
  305. & (f_!\mathcal{I})_y \arrow{r} \arrow{d}{\simeq}
  306. & (f_!\mathcal{J})_y \arrow{d}{\simeq} \\
  307. 0 \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{F}_y) \arrow{r}
  308. & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{I}_y) \arrow{r}
  309. & \Gamma_c(X_y, \mathcal{J}_y)
  310. \end{tikzcd}
  311. .\] The five-lemma yields the desired isomorphism.
  312. \end{proof}
  313. \begin{satz}[Lower shriek is exact on soft]
  314. Let $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ be an exact sequence
  315. in $\sh{X}$ with $\mathcal{F}'$ soft. Then the sequence
  316. \[
  317. 0 \to f_{!}\mathcal{F}' \to f_{!}\mathcal{F} \to f_{!}\mathcal{F}'' \to 0
  318. \] is exact.
  319. \label{satz:lower-shriek-exact-on-soft}
  320. \end{satz}
  321. \begin{proof}
  322. Since $f_{!}$ is left exact, we only need to show the surjectivity on the right, i.e.
  323. for every $y \in Y$ the surjectivity of $(f_{!}\mathcal{F})_y \to (f_{!}\mathcal{F}'')_y$.
  324. We have the following commutative diagram:
  325. \[
  326. \begin{tikzcd}
  327. \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) \arrow{r} \arrow{d} & \arrow{d}
  328. \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}''|_{f^{-1}(y)}) \\
  329. (f_!\mathcal{F})_y \arrow{r} & (f_!\mathcal{F}'')_y
  330. \end{tikzcd}
  331. .\] By \ref{thm:base-change}, the vertical arrows are isomorphisms. It suffices
  332. thus to show the surjectivity of
  333. $\Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}_{f^{-1}(y)}) \to \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}''|_{f^{-1}(y)})$.
  334. Restriction to $f^{-1}(y)$ is exact, moreover it preserves softness. We thus reduced
  335. to showing that $\Gamma_c(X, \cdot)$ preserves surjections.
  336. Suppose first that $X$ is compact and let $s \in \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') = \Gamma(X, \mathcal{F}'')$.
  337. Since $\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is exact, there exist
  338. a covering $X = \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i$ and lifts $t_i \in \mathcal{F}(U_i)$
  339. of $s|_{U_i}$. By local compactness of $X$, we may assume, after a possible refinement, that each
  340. $U_i$ contains a compact set $V_i$ whose interiors still cover $X$. Since
  341. $X$ is compact, we may assume $I$ is finite. To piece together the $t_i$, we may assume, by induction,
  342. that $\#I = 2$.
  343. Consider $t_1|_{U_1 \cap U_2} - t_2|_{U_1 \cap U_2}$. This is necessarily a section $e'$ of
  344. $\mathcal{F}'(U_1 \cap U_2)$ as it maps to zero in $\mathcal{F}''(U_1 \cap U_2)$. Restricting
  345. $e'$ to the compact $V_1 \cap V_2$ and extending it by softness, yields a global section $e$ of
  346. $\mathcal{F}'$. Now
  347. \[
  348. (t_2|_{V_2} + e|_{V_2})|_{V_1 \cap V_2} = t_2|_{V_1 \cap V_2} + e'|_{V_1 \cap V_2} = t_1|_{V_1 \cap V_2}
  349. .\] Thus $t_1|_{V_1}, t_2|_{V_2} + e|_{V_2}$ glue to a global section $t$ of $\mathcal{F}$
  350. with image $s$.
  351. Now for general $X$: Let $s \in \mathcal{F}''(X)$ with compact support $Z$. By local compactness,
  352. there exists a compact neighbourhood $Z' \subseteq X$ of $Z$. Since
  353. pullback of sheaves is exact and restriction of soft sheaves to closed subsets preserves softness,
  354. applying the result to $Z'$,
  355. yields a section $t' \in \mathcal{F}(Z')$ lifting $s|_{Z'}$. The restriction
  356. $t'|_{\partial Z'}$ maps to $s|_{\partial Z'} = 0$, so $t'|_{\partial Z'} \in \mathcal{F}'(\partial Z')$.
  357. Since $\partial Z'$ is compact and $\mathcal{F}'$ is soft, $t'|_{\partial Z'}$
  358. extends to a global section $b$ of $\mathcal{F}'$. Thus
  359. \[
  360. (t' - b|_{Z'})|_{\partial Z'} = t'|_{\partial Z'} - t'|_{\partial Z'} = 0
  361. .\] So
  362. $t' - b|_{Z'}$ on $Z'$ and $0$ on $\overline{X \setminus Z'}$ glue to a global section
  363. $t$ of $\mathcal{F}$. Then $t|_{Z'} = t' - b|_{Z'}$ maps to $s|_{Z'}$ since
  364. $b \in \mathcal{F}'(X)$. Since $\supp{t}, \supp{s} \subseteq Z'$, $t$ is a compactly supported lift of $s$.
  365. \end{proof}
  366. \begin{korollar}
  367. If $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is an exact sequence
  368. in $\sh{X}$ and $\mathcal{F}', \mathcal{F}$ are soft, then
  369. $\mathcal{F}''$ is soft too.
  370. \label{kor:soft-2+3}
  371. \end{korollar}
  372. \begin{proof}
  373. Let $Z \subseteq X$ be closed.
  374. Since restricting to a closed subset is exact and preserves softness,
  375. by \ref{satz:lower-shriek-exact-on-soft}
  376. $\Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}) \to \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'')$ is surjective.
  377. This yields a commutative
  378. diagram
  379. \[
  380. \begin{tikzcd}
  381. \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{d} \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'')
  382. \arrow{d} \\
  383. \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}) \arrow[twoheadrightarrow]{r} & \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'')
  384. \end{tikzcd}
  385. ,\] where the left vertical arrow is surjective, since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft. Since
  386. the composition is surjective, $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}'') \to \Gamma_c(Z, \mathcal{F}'')$ is also
  387. surjective.
  388. \end{proof}
  389. \section{Derived categories and functors}
  390. We give a brief introduction to the derived category of an abelian category $\mathcal{A}$. Let
  391. $F\colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$ be a left exact functor and let $\mathcal{A}$ have enough
  392. injectives. Then the classical derived functors exist. To compute $\mathrm{R}^{i}F(X)$ for an
  393. object $X \in \mathcal{A}$, we choose an injective resolution
  394. \[
  395. \begin{tikzcd}
  396. 0 \arrow{r} & X \arrow{r} \arrow{d} & 0 \arrow{r} \arrow{d} & 0 \arrow{r} \arrow{d} & \cdots\\
  397. 0 \arrow{r} & I_0 \arrow{r} & I_1 \arrow{r} & I_2 \arrow{r} & \cdots
  398. \end{tikzcd}
  399. \] i.e. a quasiisomorphism $X \to \com{I} $. Then
  400. $\mathrm{R}^{i}F(X) = H^{i} F(\com{I})$.
  401. New idea: identify $X$ with its resolution, in other words, turn quasiisomorphisms into
  402. isomorphisms. First step in this direction: Consider the category $\mathcal{K}(\mathcal{A})$
  403. of complexes where arrows are homomorphisms of complexes up to homotopy. Still
  404. quasiisomorphisms are in general not isomorphisms, so need to do more:
  405. Localise by the class of quasiisomorphisms. This is then called the derived category
  406. of $\mathcal{A}$:
  407. \[
  408. \mathcal{D}(\mathcal{A}) = \mathcal{K}(\mathcal{A})_{\mathcal{Q}is}
  409. .\]
  410. Exactly like in the situation for rings, not every functor $\mathcal{K}(A) \to \mathcal{K}(B)$
  411. descends to the derived category, since it needs to send quasiisomorphisms to quasiisomorphisms.
  412. If the functor is induced by an exact functor $\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$, this is the case. For
  413. an arbitrary $F\colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$, we can hope that a derived functor exists. This
  414. is defined by a universal property, that ensures that this derived functor is in a sense
  415. close to the original one.
  416. For a left exact functor $F\colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$, there is the following result:
  417. \begin{theorem}
  418. If there exists a full additive subcategory $\mathcal{L}$ in $\mathcal{A}$ that is \emph{adapted} to $F$, i.e.
  419. \begin{enumerate}[(i)]
  420. \item for any $X \in \mathcal{A}$ there exists
  421. $X' \in \mathcal{L}$ and an exact sequence
  422. $0 \to X \to X'$
  423. \item if $0 \to X' \to X \to X'' \to 0$ is exact sequence in $\mathcal{A}$ and
  424. $X'$, $X$ are in $\mathcal{L}$, then $X''$ is in $\mathcal{L}$
  425. \item if $0 \to X' \to X \to X'' \to 0$ is exact sequence in $\mathcal{A}$ and
  426. if $X', X, X''$ are in $\mathcal{L}$, then the sequence
  427. $0 \to F(X') \to F(X) \to F(X'') \to 0$ is exact.
  428. \end{enumerate}
  429. Then the derived functor
  430. $\mathrm{R}F\colon \mathcal{D}^{+}(\mathcal{A}) \to \mathcal{D}^{+}(\mathcal{B})$
  431. exists and for any $\com{I} \in \mathcal{K}^{+}(\mathcal{L})$ we have a
  432. natural isomorphism
  433. \[
  434. \mathrm{R} F (\com{I}) \simeq F(\com{I})
  435. .\]
  436. \end{theorem}
  437. Since $\sh{X}$ has enough injectives and every injective sheaf is soft, by
  438. \ref{satz:lower-shriek-exact-on-soft} and \ref{kor:soft-2+3}, the
  439. class of soft sheaves is adapted to the functor $f_!$. Thus the derived functor
  440. \[
  441. \mathrm{R} f_{!} \colon \mathcal{D}^{+}(X) \longrightarrow \mathcal{D}^{+}(Y)
  442. \] exists.
  443. \begin{korollar}
  444. For $\com{\mathcal{F}} \in \mathcal{K}om^{+}(\sh{X})$, we have a natural isomorphism
  445. \[
  446. (\mathrm{R}f_{!} \com{\mathcal{F}})_y
  447. \simeq \mathrm{R} \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \com{\mathcal{F}}|_{f^{-1}(y)})
  448. \] in $\mathcal{D}(X)$.
  449. \end{korollar}
  450. \begin{proof}
  451. Let $\com{\mathcal{F}} \to \com{\mathcal{I}}$ be an injective resolution. Then
  452. \begin{salign*}
  453. (\mathrm{R}f_{!} \com{\mathcal{F}})_y
  454. &\simeq (\mathrm{R}f_{!} \com{\mathcal{I}})_y \\
  455. &\simeq (f_{!} \com{\mathcal{I}})_y \\
  456. &\simeq \Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \com{\mathcal{I}}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) \\
  457. &\simeq \mathrm{R}\Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \com{\mathcal{I}}|_{f^{-1}(y)}) \\
  458. &\simeq \mathrm{R}\Gamma_c(f^{-1}(y), \com{\mathcal{F}}|_{f^{-1}(y)})
  459. .\end{salign*}
  460. \end{proof}
  461. %\begin{korollar}
  462. % Soft sheaves are $\Gamma_c$-acyclic.
  463. % \label{kor:soft-gamma_c-acyclic}
  464. %\end{korollar}
  465. %
  466. %\begin{proof}
  467. % Let $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be soft and
  468. % embed $\mathcal{F}$ in an injective sheaf $\mathcal{I}$. This yields an exact sequence
  469. % \[
  470. % \begin{tikzcd}
  471. % 0 \arrow{r} & \mathcal{F} \arrow{r}
  472. % & \mathcal{I} \arrow{r}
  473. % & \mathcal{G} \arrow{r}
  474. % & 0
  475. % \end{tikzcd}
  476. % .\]
  477. % Since $\mathcal{I}$ is injective, in particular flasque, hence soft,
  478. % by \ref{kor:soft-2+3}, $\mathcal{G}$ is soft.
  479. % We proceed by induction. For $i = 1$ consider the exact sequence
  480. % \[
  481. % \begin{tikzcd}
  482. % 0 \arrow{r} & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r}
  483. % & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{I}) \arrow{r}
  484. % & \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{G}) \arrow{r}
  485. % & H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r}
  486. % & \underbrace{H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0}
  487. % \end{tikzcd}
  488. % .\]
  489. % Since $\mathcal{F}$ is soft, $\Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{I}) \to \Gamma_c(X, \mathcal{G})$ is
  490. % surjective. By the exactness of the sequence, $H_c^{1}(X, \mathcal{F})$ vanishes.
  491. % Now assume $H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{F}) = 0$ for any soft sheaf $\mathcal{F}$. Then the exact sequence
  492. % \[
  493. % \begin{tikzcd}
  494. % \underbrace{H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0} \arrow{r} & H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{G}) \arrow{r}
  495. % & H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{F}) \arrow{r}
  496. % & \underbrace{H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{I})}_{= 0}
  497. % \end{tikzcd}
  498. % \] yields an isomorphism $H_c^{i}(X, \mathcal{G}) \simeq H_c^{i+1}(X, \mathcal{F})$ and
  499. % since $\mathcal{G}$ is soft, the left hand side is zero by induction hypothesis.
  500. %\end{proof}
  501. %\begin{satz}
  502. % Soft sheaves are $f_!$-acyclic. In particular, if
  503. % $0 \to \mathcal{F}' \to \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is an exact sequence in $\sh{X}$
  504. % and $\mathcal{F}'$ is soft, then the sequence
  505. % $0 \to f_!\mathcal{F}' \to f_!\mathcal{F} \to f_!\mathcal{F}'' \to 0$ is exact.
  506. %\end{satz}
  507. %
  508. %\begin{proof}
  509. % Let $i > 0$ and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ be soft. Then for $y \in Y$
  510. % \begin{salign*}
  511. % (R^{i}f_!\mathcal{F})_y
  512. % \stackrel{\ref{thm:base-change}}{\simeq} H_c^{i}(f^{-1}(y), \mathcal{F}|_{f^{-1}(y)})
  513. % \; \stackrel{\ref{kor:soft-gamma_c-acyclic}}{=} \; 0
  514. % ,\end{salign*}
  515. % since the restriction of a soft sheaf to a closed subset is soft.
  516. %\end{proof}
  517. \color{gray}
  518. \begin{bsp}
  519. Let $U \subseteq X$ be open and $j\colon U \to X$ the inclusion map. By looking at stalks,
  520. one finds that $j_!\mathcal{F}$ for $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{U}$ is just extension by zero.
  521. \end{bsp}
  522. \begin{satz}[Lower shriek preserves softness]
  523. If $f\colon X \to Y$ is continuous and $\mathcal{F} \in \sh{X}$ is soft, then
  524. $f_! \mathcal{F}$ is soft too.
  525. \end{satz}
  526. \begin{proof}
  527. Let $Z \subseteq Y$ be compact and
  528. $s \in (f_!\mathcal{F})(Z) \simeq \colim{Z \subseteq U \subseteq Y} (f_!\mathcal{F})(U)$. Then
  529. there exists an open neighbourhood $U$ of $Z$ and an extension
  530. $\tilde{s} \in (f_!\mathcal{F})(U) \subseteq \mathcal{F}(f^{-1}(U))$ with
  531. $\supp{\tilde{s}} \xrightarrow{f} U$ proper. Since $Y$ is locally compact, there exists
  532. a compact neighbourhood $L \subseteq U$ of $Z$. Restricting $\tilde{s}$ to the compact
  533. $K \coloneqq \left(f|_{\supp{\tilde{s}}}\right)^{-1}(L) \subseteq \supp{\tilde{s}}$
  534. and extending by softness of $\mathcal{F}$, yields a compactly supported global section
  535. $t \in \mathcal{F}(X) = (f_{*}\mathcal{F})(Y)$ such that $t|_Z = s$. Since
  536. $\supp{t}$ is compact and $Y$ is Hausdorff, $\supp{t} \xrightarrow{f} Y$ is proper.
  537. \end{proof}
  538. \begin{korollar}[Leray spectral sequence]
  539. Given continuous maps $f\colon X \to Y$, $g\colon Y \to Z$ of spaces,
  540. there is a natural isomorphism
  541. $\mathrm{R}(g \circ f)_{!} \simeq \mathrm{R}g_{!} \circ \mathrm{R}f_{!}$.
  542. \end{korollar}
  543. \begin{proof}
  544. Since soft sheaves are $f_{!}$ (and $g_!$) acyclic and $f_{!}$ maps
  545. soft sheaves to soft sheaves, the result follows from
  546. Proposition 5.4 in \cite{hartshorne}.
  547. \end{proof}
  548. \color{black}
  549. \section{Other functors on abelian sheaves}
  550. \begin{tabular}{l|l|l|l}
  551. Functor & Exactness & Derivative & Adapted class \\ \hline
  552. $f^* \colon \sh{Y} \to \sh{X}$
  553. & exact
  554. & $f^{*}\colon \mathcal{D}(Y) \to \mathcal{D}(X)$ \\
  555. $f_* \colon \sh{X} \to \sh{Y}$
  556. & left exact
  557. & $\mathrm{R} f_{*}\colon \mathcal{D}(X) \to \mathcal{D}(Y)$
  558. & K-limp complexes \\
  559. $\cdot \otimes \mathcal{F} \colon \sh{X} \to \sh{X}$
  560. & right exact
  561. & $\cdot \otimes^{L} \com{\mathcal{F}} \colon \mathcal{D}(X) \to \mathcal{D}(X)$
  562. & K-flat complexes \\
  563. $\underline{\operatorname{Hom}}(\mathcal{F}, \cdot)\colon \sh{X} \to \sh{X}$
  564. & left exact
  565. & $\mathrm{R}\com{\underline{\operatorname{Hom}}}(\com{\mathcal{F}}, \cdot)\colon \mathcal{D}(X) \to \mathcal{D}(X)$
  566. & K-injective complexes \\
  567. $f_!\colon \sh{X} \to \sh{Y}$
  568. & left exact
  569. & $\mathrm{R}f_{!}\colon \mathcal{D}^{+}(X) \to \mathcal{D}^{+}(Y)$
  570. & soft sheaves \\
  571. &
  572. & $f^{!}\colon \mathcal{D}^{+}(Y) \to \mathcal{D}(X)$
  573. \end{tabular}
  574. \noindent The internal $\mathrm{Hom}$ functor is for $\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G} \in \sh{X}$
  575. given by the formula
  576. \[
  577. \underline{\operatorname{Hom}}(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G})(U)
  578. = \operatorname{Hom}_{\sh{U}}(\mathcal{F}|_U, \mathcal{G}|_U)
  579. \] for every $U \subseteq X$ open and the (internal) tensor product by the sheafification
  580. of the presheaf
  581. \[
  582. U \mapsto \mathcal{F}(U) \otimes \mathcal{G}(U)
  583. .\]
  584. These functors satisfy the following adjunction results
  585. \[
  586. f^{*} \dashv \mathrm{R}f_{*}
  587. \] and
  588. \[
  589. \cdot \otimes^{L} \com{\mathcal{F}} \dashv
  590. \mathrm{R}\underline{\operatorname{Hom}}(\com{\mathcal{F}}, \cdot )
  591. .\]
  592. \bibliographystyle{alpha}
  593. \bibliography{refs}
  594. \end{document}