|
- \documentclass{lecture}
-
- \begin{document}
-
- \section{Abstract affine varieties}
-
- Recall that an isomorphism of spaces with functions is a morphism
- $f\colon (X, \mathcal{O}_X) \to (Y, \mathcal{O}_Y)$ that admits an inverse morphism.
-
- \begin{bem}[]
- As we have seen, a bijective morphism is not necessarily an isomorphism.
- \end{bem}
-
- \begin{bem}
- Somewhat more formally, one could also define a morphism of spaces
- with functions (over $k$) to be a pair $(f, \varphi)$ such that
- $f\colon X \to Y$ is a continuous map and $\varphi\colon \mathcal{O}_Y \to f_{*}\mathcal{O}_X$
- is the morphism of sheaves $f^{*}$. The question then arises how to define
- properly the composition $(g, \psi) \circ (f, \varphi)$. The formal answer is
- $(g \circ f, f_{*}(\varphi) \circ \psi)$.
- \end{bem}
-
- \begin{definition}[]
- Let $k$ be a field. An (abstract) \emph{affine variety over $k$}
- (also called an affine $k$-variety)
- is a space with functions $(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$
- over $k$ that is isomorphic to the space with functions $(V, \mathcal{O}_V)$, where
- $V$ is an algebraic subset of some affine space $k^{n}$ and $\mathcal{O}_V$ is the
- sheaf of regular functions on $V$.
-
- A morphism of affine $k$-varieties is a morphism of the underlying spaces with functions.
- \end{definition}
-
- \begin{bsp}[]
-
- \begin{enumerate}[(i)]
- \item An algebraic subset $V \subseteq k^{n}$, endowed with its sheaf of regular functions
- $\mathcal{O}_V$, is an affine variety.
- \item It is perhaps not obvious at first, but a standard open set
- $D_V(f)$, where $f\colon V \to k$ is a regular function on an algebraic set
- $V \subseteq k^{n}$, defines an affine variety. Indeed, when
- equipped with its sheaf of regular functions,
- $D_V(f) \simeq \mathcal{V}_{k^{n+1}}(tf(x) - 1)$.
- \end{enumerate}
-
- \end{bsp}
-
- \begin{bem}[]
- Let $(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ be a space with functions. An open subset $U \subseteq X$ defines
- a space with functions $(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$. If
- $(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ is isomorphic to some standard open set
- $D_V(f)$ of an algebraic set $V \subseteq k^{n}$, we will call
- $U$ an \emph{affine open set}.
-
- Then the observation is the following: since an algebraic set $V \subseteq k^{n}$
- is a finite union of standard open sets, every point $x$ in an affine variety $X$
- has an affine open neighbourhood.
-
- Less formally, an affine variety $X$, locally ,,looks like`` a standard open set
- $D_V(f) \subseteq k^{n}$, where $V \subseteq k^{n}$ is an algebraic set. In particular,
- open subsets of an affine variety also locally look like standard open sets. In fact,
- they are finite unions of such sets.
- \end{bem}
-
- \begin{bsp}[]
- The algebraic group $\mathrm{GL}(n ; k)$ is an affine variety over $k$.
- \end{bsp}
-
- \begin{bem}[]
- An algebraic set $(V, \mathcal{O}_V)$ is a subset $V \subseteq k^{n}$ defined
- by polynomial equations and equipped with its sheaf of regular functions.
- An affine variety $(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ is
- ,,like an algebraic set`` but without a reference to a particular
- ,,embedding`` in affine space. This is similar to having a finitely generated $k$-Algebra $A$
- without specifying a particular isomorphism
- \[
- A \simeq k[X_1, \ldots, X_n] / I
- .\] The next example will illustrate precisely this fact.
- \end{bem}
-
- \begin{bsp}[]
- Let us now give an abstract example of an affine variety.
- We consider a finitely generated $k$-algebra $A$ and define
- $X \coloneqq \operatorname{Hom}_{k-\mathrm{Alg}}(A, k)$. The idea is to think
- of $X$ as points on which we can evaluate elements of $A$, which are thought of
- as functions on $X$. For $x \in \operatorname{Hom}_{k}(A, k)$ and
- $f \in A$ we set $f(x) \coloneqq x(f) \in k$.
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Topology on $X$: for all ideal $I \subseteq A$, set
- \[
- \mathcal{V}_X(I) \coloneqq \{ x \in X \mid \forall x \in I\colon f(x) = 0\}
- .\] These subsets of $X$ are the closed sets of a topology on $X$, which
- we may call the Zariski topology.
- \item Regular functions on $X$: if $U \subseteq X$ is open,
- a function $h\colon U \to k$ is called regular at $x \in U$ if
- there it exists an open set $x \in U_x$ and elements
- $P, Q \in A$ such that for $y \in U_x$, $Q(y) \neq 0$ and
- $h(y) = \frac{P(y)}{Q(y)}$ in $k$.
-
- The function $h$ is called regular on $U$
- iff it is regular at $x \in U$. Regular functions then form a sheaf of
- $k$-algebras on $X$.
-
- Moreover, if $h\colon U \to k$ is regular on $X$, the
- set $D_X(h) \coloneqq \{ x \in X \mid h(x) \neq 0\} $ is open in $X$
- and the function $\frac{1}{h}$ is regular on $D_X(h)$.
- \end{itemize}
- So, we have defined a space with functions $(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$, at least
- whenever $X \neq \emptyset$. We show that $X$ is an affine variety.
-
- \begin{proof}
- Fix a system of generators of $A$, i.e.
- \[
- A \simeq k[t_1, \ldots, t_n] / I
- \] where $k[t_1, \ldots, t_n]$ is a polynomial algebra. We denote
- by $\overline{t_1}, \ldots, \overline{t_n}$ the images of $t_1, \ldots, t_n$ in $A$
- and we define
- \begin{salign*}
- \varphi\colon X = \operatorname{Hom}_{k}(A, k)& \to k^{n} \\
- x &\mapsto (x(\overline{t_1}), \ldots, x(\overline{t_n}))
- .\end{salign*}
- Let $P \in I$ and $x \in X$. Then
- \[
- P(\varphi(x)) = P(x(\overline{t_1}), \ldots, x(\overline{t_n}))
- = x(\overline{P}) = 0
- .\] Thus $\varphi(x) \in \mathcal{V}_{k^{n}}(I)$.
- Conversely let $a = (a_1, \ldots, a_n) \in \mathcal{V}_{k^{n}}(I)$, then
- we can define a morphism of $k$-algebras
- \[
- x_a\colon A \to A / (\overline{t_1} -a_1, \ldots, \overline{t_n} - a_n)
- \simeq k
- \] which satisfies $x_a(\overline{t_i}) = a_i$ for all $i$. So
- $(a_1, \ldots, a_n) = \varphi(x_a) \in \text{im } \varphi$.
-
- In particular, we have defined a map
- \begin{salign*}
- \psi\colon \mathcal{V}_{k^{n}}(I) &\to X = \operatorname{Hom}_k(A, k) \\
- a &\mapsto x_a
- \end{salign*} such that $\varphi \circ \psi = \text{Id}_{\mathcal{V}_{k^{n}}(I)}$. In fact,
- we also have $\psi \circ \varphi = \text{Id}_X$.
-
- It remains to check that $\varphi$ and $\psi$ are morphisms of spaces with functions, which
- follows from the definition of the topology and the notion of regular function on $X$.
- \end{proof}
-
- The elements of $X \coloneqq \operatorname{Hom}_k(A, k)$ are also called the
- \emph{characters} of the $k$-algebra $A$, and this is sometimes denoted
- by $\hat{A} \coloneqq \operatorname{Hom}_{k-\text{alg}}(A, k)$. Note that
- $\hat{A}$ is a $k$-subalgebra of the algebra of all functions $f\colon A \to k$.
-
- The character $x_a$ introduced above and associated to an alemenet $a \in A$ is then
- denoted by $\hat{a}$ and called the \emph{Gelfand transform} of $a$. The
- \emph{Gelfand transformation} is the morphism of $k$-algebras
- \begin{salign*}
- A &\to \hat{A} \\
- a &\mapsto \hat{a}
- .\end{salign*}
- \end{bsp}
-
- \begin{aufgabe}
- Let $A$ be a finitely generated $k$-algebra and let
- $X = \operatorname{Hom}_{k\text{-alg}}(A, k)$. Show that the map
- $x \mapsto \text{ker } x$ induces a bijection
- \[
- X \simeq \{ \mathfrak{m} \in \operatorname{Spm} A \mid A / \mathfrak{m} \simeq k\}
- .\]
- \end{aufgabe}
-
- \begin{bem}[]
- Note that we have not assumed $A$ to be reduced and that, if we
- set $A_{\text{red}} \coloneqq A / \sqrt{(0)}$, then
- $A_{\text{red}}$ is reduced and
- $\hat{A_{\text{red}}} = \hat{A}$, because a maximal ideal of $A$ necessarily
- contains $\sqrt{(0)}$ and the quotient field is ,,the same``.
- \end{bem}
-
- \begin{bem}
- Let $(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ be an affine variety. One can associate the $k$-algebra
- $\mathcal{O}_X(X)$ of globally defined regular functions on $X$:
- \[
- \mathcal{O}_X(X) = \{ f \colon X \to k \mid f \text{ regular on } X\}
- .\]
- Moreover, if $\varphi\colon (X, \mathcal{O}_X) \to (Y, \mathcal{O}_Y)$ is
- a morphism between two affine varieties, we have a $k$-algebra homomorphism
- \begin{salign*}
- \varphi^{*}\colon \mathcal{O}_Y(Y) &\to \mathcal{O}_X(X) \\
- f &\mapsto f \circ \varphi
- .\end{salign*}
- Also, $(\text{id}_X)^{*} = \text{id}_{\mathcal{O}_X(X)}$ and
- $(\psi \circ \varphi)^{*} = \varphi^{*} \circ \psi^{*}$ whenever
- $\psi\colon (Y, \mathcal{O}_Y) \to (Z, \mathcal{O}_Z)$ is a morphism of
- affine varieties. In other words, we have defined a (contravariant) functor
- $k$-Aff $\to k$-Alg.
- \end{bem}
-
- \begin{satz}
- Let $k$ be a field. The functor
- \begin{salign*}
- k\text{-Aff} &\to k\text{-Alg} \\
- (X, \mathcal{O}_X) &\mapsto \mathcal{O}_X(X)
- \end{salign*}
- is fully faithful.
- \end{satz}
-
- \begin{proof}
- Since $X$ and $Y$ are affine, we may assume $X = V \subseteq k^{n}$
- and $Y = W \subseteq k^{m}$. Then $\varphi\colon V \to W$
- is given by $m$ regular functions $(\varphi_1, \ldots, \varphi_m)$
- on $V$. On $k^{m}$, let us denote by $y_i$ the projection to the $i$-th factor.
- Its restriction to $W$ is a regular function
- \[
- y_i|_W \colon W \to k
- \] that satisfies $\varphi^{*}(y_i|_W) = \varphi_i$.
-
- Since for all regular functions $f\colon W \to k$ one has
- \[
- \varphi^{*}f = f \circ \varphi = f(\varphi_1, \ldots, \varphi_m)
- ,\] we see that the morphism
- \[
- \varphi^{*}\colon \mathcal{O}_W(W) \to \mathcal{O}_V(V)
- \] is entirely determined by the $m$ regular functions $\varphi^{*}(y_i|_W) = \varphi_i$
- on $V$. In particular, if $\varphi^{*} = \psi^{*}$, then
- $\varphi_i = \varphi^{*}(y_i|_W) = \psi^{*}(y_i|_W) = \psi_i$, so $\varphi = \psi$,
- which proves that $\varphi \mapsto \varphi^{*}$ is injective.
-
- Surjectivity: Let $h\colon \mathcal{O}_W(W) \to \mathcal{O}_V(V)$ be a morphism
- of $k$-algebras. Let
- \[
- \varphi \coloneqq (h(y_1|_W), \ldots, h(y_m|_W))
- \] which is a morphism from $V$ to $k^{m}$, because its components are regular functions
- on $V$. It satisfies $\varphi^{*}(y_i|_W) = \varphi_i = h(y_i|_W)$, so $\varphi^{*} = h$.
-
- It remains to show, that $\varphi(V) \subseteq W$. Let $W = \mathcal{V}(P_1, \ldots, P_r)$
- with $P_j \in k[Y_1, \ldots, Y_m]$. Then for all $j \in \{1, \ldots, r\} $
- and $x \in V$
- \[
- P_j(\varphi(x)) = P_j(h(y_1|_W), \ldots, h(y_m|_W))(x)
- .\] Since $h$ is a morphism of $k$-algebras and $P_j$ is a polynomial, we have
- \[
- P_j(h(y_1|_W), \ldots, h(y_m|_W)) = h(P_j(y_1|_W), \ldots, P_j(y_m|_W))
- .\] But $P_j \in \mathcal{I}(W)$, so
- \[
- P_j(y_1|_W, \ldots, y_m|_W) = P_j(y_1, \ldots, y_m)|_W = 0
- ,\] which proves that for $x \in V$, $\varphi(x) \in W$.
- \end{proof}
-
- \end{document}
|